Is it? Isn't it really a fork?
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| caitlyn Sep 28, 2010 11:07 PM EDT |
Oracle still employs a lot of the OpenOffice.org developers and they can certainly continue the product if they wish. This is a fork, not a continuation, and the two will compete until Oracle says otherwise. |
| Sander_Marechal Sep 29, 2010 12:26 AM EDT |
Yup. LibreOffice is the new Go-OO if anything. |
| caitlyn Sep 29, 2010 12:38 AM EDT |
I don't know that Novell is ready to turn Go-OO loose either. It would be nice if they got behind LibreOffice but I wouldn't bet my bottom dollar on it. |
| gus3 Sep 29, 2010 1:29 AM EDT |
Right along these lines: http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100928224103271 Seven questions from Pamela Jones, and seven answers from Charles-H. Schultz from The Document Foundation. |
| tracyanne Sep 29, 2010 7:59 AM EDT |
I'd have to say that if leaving out the OOXML stuf that was developed with the aid of Microsoft cause OOXML compatibility to suffer LibreOffice will be a hard sell. |
| caitlyn Sep 29, 2010 11:40 AM EDT |
I agree with tracyanne on this one. If document compatibility with MS Office isn't there nobody except hard core FSF types will touch it. |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!