I just discovered something
I discovered this while reading through a copy of Full Circle Magazine (issue 24 actually), I have in my ebook reader.
In response to Question #2: A separate /home partition has not been necessary in a while. Ubuntu's installers do not remove directories named "home" when installing. Mounting a separate home partition is not necessary, because Ubuntu doesn't remove any directory named /home when you install Ubuntu, and that is why the default ubuntu install doesn't create a seperate partition for the home directory, and why it has been unnecessary for me to go to all the trouble of manually creating a /home partition. Even more anoying is that when I was corresponding with Canonical about how to custom build the installer to create a /home partition, instead of telling me it was unnecessary, they kept offering to sign me up for unnecessary paid support services. |
| Subject | Topic Starter | Replies | Views | Last Post |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| separate /home can be convenient | gus3 | 25 | 1,171 | Dec 16, 2009 4:10 AM |
| "separate /home partition has not been necessary in a while" | Steven_Rosenber | 4 | 1,170 | Dec 15, 2009 3:01 PM |
You cannot post until you login.
|