Linux News Wary of Gartner Reporting on Microsoft Vista

Posted by tadelste on Nov 15, 2005 6:14 AM
Lxer Day Desk; By Tom Adelstein

LXer Day Desk: 11-15-2005

Not to suggest that Bill Gates and Michael Dell have any influence on famed Gartner Distinguished Analysts, I tend to look skeptically at their pronouncements. Once Silver Lake Partners, a Silicon Valley private equity-investment firm took an increasing stake in the Gartner, I started pondering the effect of having Bill and Michael as investors in Silver Lake limited partnerships. So, when Gartner said, hold off on Vista until 2008 I started looking for a catch.
Diggable

According to reports, analysts at Gartner may have suggested that companies shouldn't rush to upgrade to Microsoft Windows Vista. And why? According to many sources the majority of improvements in Vista will be security-related. And that functionality "is available via third-party products today," Gartner claimed in a research note published two weeks ago Friday.



While Vista will "offer incremental, evolutionary improvements" over its predecessors, XP users should "pursue a strategy of managed diversity" only bringing in Vista on new machines and not until 2008, the analysts recommend.



So, that's where I become concerned. First, any experienced procurement specialist knows that as soon as Vista becomes available, every computer manufacturer on the globe will bundle the newest Microsoft operating system with their desktops, laptops and servers.



Microsoft will pull Windows XP off-the-shelves and replace it with their newest products. I have watched retailers boxing up previously marketed versions of Windows and Office for credit while the clerks stocked the shelves with the newest Microsoft offerings. If they want their marketing rebates, retailers and OEMs better sell the latest and greatest from Redmond.



In its research note, Ten reasons you should and shouldn't care about Microsoft's Windows Vista client, Gartner provided weaknesses in Microsoft's platform strategy. And to experienced readers, this looks like reverse psychology and disinformation combined.



If I can get rid of all those third party security products and buy everything in one package, I would send out a team to upgrade the entire enterprise. Perhaps Gartner analysts forgot how Microsoft markets its products.



According to the reports, Internet Explorer (IE) 7 will have many security improvements "to stem defections from IE to Firefox". Microsoft expects to release IE 7 in early 2006 before the release of Vista. Supposedly, significant functionality will require Vista. Of course, IE 7 will incorporate features found in Firefox. Does anyone believe that IE 7 will have a warning that says "don't upgrade unless you have Vista".



Microsoft flashes a notice in Windows XP that says you are at risk if you don't enable automatic updates. Are we supposed to believe IE 7 won't have a listing in "Critical Updates"?



Also on the security side, the Windows Vista personal firewall will improve on the one included in XP Service Pack 2, Gartner claims. However, XP seems good enough. That's why Zonelabs and other firewall manufacturers have experienced success replacing the flimsy XP firewall.



Again, if I don't have to pay for a new Zonelabs license when I buy a new computer for one of my staff, why wouldn't I just move up to Vista? Gartner sent a clear message to me - buy Vista.



What Do You Find Inferred?



I see a clear message in the Gartner report: You should hold off buying Vista because you can find third-party products for old XP to perform functions immediately available in Vista. In the craft of writing, we refer to what sits behind the written word as subtext. We define subtext as information in statement which is not contained in its text but is nonetheless inferred by the reader.



If you want to avoid thirty-party products and have the security offered by Microsoft now, start looking at Linux. Save money, maintain your investment in hardware and learn Linux now instead of Vista later. If I worked for Gartner, that's what I would want to say. But then, I have no Silicon Valley private equity-investment firm with Bill Gates and Michael Dell as investors looking over my shoulder. They call that looking: Corporate Governance.





Return to the LXer Features

Subject Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
how convoluted does it get? tuxchick 6 1,288 Nov 22, 2005 6:11 AM

You cannot post until you login.

LXer

  Latest Features
Scott Ruecker (Phoenix, U.S.): LXer Weekly Roundup for 20-Jul-2014
Jul 20, 2014

Carla Schroder: Test Sites for Heartbleed OpenSSL Vulnerability
Apr 09, 2014

penguinist: Better Than a Quad-Head Display: My Adventures with "4K" 2160p and Linux
Mar 31, 2014

Dr Tony Young: Replacing KDE4 with Xfce
Mar 07, 2014

Dr Tony Young: Removing/Disabling The Semantic Deskop in KDE4 Running on openSUSE 13.1 Part 2
Feb 18, 2014

Dr Tony Young: Removing/Disabling The Semantic Deskop in KDE4 (and firing up Thunderbird) Part 1
Feb 08, 2014

Dr Tony Young: KMail Complexity - and a little Patience
Jan 26, 2014

Carla Schroder: Linux Nerd New Year's Resolutions
Dec 29, 2013

Carla Schroder: Fedora 20 Released With New, Newer, and Newest
Dec 17, 2013

Dr Tony Young: Trouble-shooting a VoIP Modem
Nov 07, 2013


View all

  Search Features

Search LXer Features:

[ Copyright © LXer | All times are recorded in Central Daylight Time (CDT) ]

[ Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | About us | rss | Mobile ]

Login