Opinion: Why Linux isn't ready for the Desktop

Posted by dave on Jul 27, 2004 7:17 AM EDT
OSnews; By Ernesto Garbarino 		Mail this story
Print this story

First of all, we should agree on what the definition of "ready for the desktop" stands for. For some of us it refers to a graphical user interface in which applications have icons and can be launched in an intuitive manner without the need of complex commands. Even a Commodore 64 running Geos could be "ready for the desktop" by this definition, but the fact is that when we read "ready for the desktop" we understand "ready to replace Microsoft Windows".

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Groups: Microsoft; Story Type: News Story

« Return to the newswire homepage

Subject Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
Why LX'er should dump articles that start with the word sbergman27 0 1,800 Jul 27, 2004 5:09 PM

You cannot post until you login.