Court upends $368M ruling against Apple for VirnetX patent infringement
|
|
In its ruling, the appeals court did not rule that any of VirnetX's patents were invalid, and it only reversed the finding of infringement on one claim pertaining to a VPN On Demand patent. The court also said that the Texas District Court had not correctly defined a term that appeared in two of the patents, and it sent the decision back to Tyler, Texas so the court there can reassess the patent claims based on the appeals court's new term construction.
|
|
Full Story |
This topic does not have any threads posted yet!
You cannot post until you login.
