Firm offers to patent security fixes
|
Author | Content |
---|---|
henke54 Jun 06, 2007 7:56 AM EDT |
Quoting:The market for software vulnerabilities just got even more complex with the arrival of a firm that offers security researchers a chance to profit from their work by patenting security fixes.http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/06/06/security_fix_patent/ |
techiem2 Jun 06, 2007 8:14 AM EDT |
O.o |
Teron Jun 07, 2007 1:22 AM EDT |
W
T
F ... |
tracyanne Jun 07, 2007 1:49 AM EDT |
Capitalism in action. If there is a need for something, money can be made from it. |
techiem2 Jun 07, 2007 3:54 AM EDT |
From the company's FAQ http://intellectualweapons.com/faq.htmQuoting: Q. Is it ethical?Then there's a list of several instances of small companies making money from patent cases. Ethical? Doesn't seem so to me. Responsible Disclosure? Yeah Right. Just imagine someone calling up the Secret Service: "I've discovered that someone will be killing the president in the near future. I have a patent on the super sekret method you have to use that's the only way to protect him. I'll tell you what it is and let you use it for $500M" |
jdixon Jun 07, 2007 5:25 AM EDT |
> "I've discovered that someone will be killing the president in the near future. I have a patent on the super sekret method you have to use that's the only way to protect him. I'll tell you what it is and let you use it for $500M" And how would this be unethical? He's not saying he knows how to protect him, only how to find out. Finding out requires using the patented technology, and if it's a patented technology, then the US government should pay for a license to use it, the same as everyone else. Now, if he has already used the technology himself, and knows how to protect the president, that's another matter. Then he's withholding information needed for national security reasons. But as long as he hasn't actually done so, all he's doing is asking for a license fee, which is perfectly ethical. Stupid, since the government will simply take the technology from him, but ethical. |
NoDough Jun 07, 2007 9:14 AM EDT |
And here's a big shout-out to the men and women of the U.S. Secret Service. Welcome to LXer! :-D |
techiem2 Jun 07, 2007 3:57 PM EDT |
hehe. Man, now jdixon's got my head spinning. All those fine lines. :) |
dinotrac Jun 07, 2007 5:13 PM EDT |
I'm still trying to figure out whether the Secret Service can protect the President without violating GPLV3. |
jdixon Jun 07, 2007 6:11 PM EDT |
> I'm still trying to figure out whether the Secret Service can protect the President without violating GPLV3. This President. Almost certainly not. The very idea of open anything is foreign to this administration. Of course, that's been true of most administrations in modern times. |
NoDough Jun 07, 2007 6:24 PM EDT |
Quoting:The very idea of open anything is foreign to this administration.I dunno. He seems OK with open borders. ;) |
jdixon Jun 07, 2007 7:11 PM EDT |
> I dunno. He seems OK with open borders. ;) And open phone lines. I stand corrected. |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!