Data Centre Locations
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| beirwin Mar 22, 2009 10:34 AM CST |
All their data centres will be in coastal California -- a high-risk earthquake zone. IMO, they should have them spread out to other areas of the U.S. to minimize the risk. |
| tracyanne Mar 22, 2009 2:38 PM CST |
they should have them spread around the world to minimise risk, not just the one endemic to California. |
| caitlyn Mar 22, 2009 3:43 PM CST |
California is a very big place. An earthquake in the San Francisco Bay Area isn't going to affect Los Angeles or San Diego in a meaningful way and vice versa. |
| beirwin Mar 22, 2009 5:37 PM CST |
Granted, California is a big place, but it if it's "The Big One" - a megathrust earthquake -- anywhere along the coast up to British Columbia -- will not escape. I'm very aware of this possibility living on Vancouver Island. These suckers happen every 300 to 500 years -- the last being in 1700. |
| Sander_Marechal Mar 22, 2009 7:10 PM CST |
Well, if "The Big One" hits then there are more important things to worry about than the internet archive. |
| tracyanne Mar 22, 2009 8:23 PM CST |
I was thinking more in terms of coporate/government interference. |
| gus3 Mar 22, 2009 11:09 PM CST |
TA, Hmmm, a very good point to ponder. But IMNSHO, California relishes the image of "#1 tech state in the world," and meddling in the Internet Archive's affairs would seriously jeopardize that. Besides, the Governator has other matters on his plate at the moment. |
| azerthoth Mar 22, 2009 11:45 PM CST |
gus, this is the state that wanted to put government controlled thermostats in all the houses, nuff said about letting them deal with anything serious. |
| gus3 Mar 23, 2009 12:07 AM CST |
The idea came up, the talking heads floated the idea, and it sank like a brick. Meddling with the Internet Archive will meet the same fate. |
| jdixon Mar 23, 2009 5:10 AM CST |
> ...the Governator has other matters on his plate at the moment. It's not just California's government you have to worry about. :( |
| tuxtom Mar 23, 2009 7:29 AM CST |
Quoting:It's not just California's government you have to worry about. :(Viewing that empirically, the worrying should have started 8 1/2 years ago. |
| azerthoth Mar 23, 2009 8:17 AM CST |
@tuxtom, flame bait. |
| gus3 Mar 23, 2009 9:07 AM CST |
tuxtom's right. That's when I, in my tiny cubicle, began an inexorable chain of events, of which you now see the crescendo. Mwahahahahaha... |
| jdixon Mar 23, 2009 9:18 AM CST |
> ...the worrying should have started 8 1/2 years ago. Oh, much longer ago than that. Or are you forgetting the Communications Decency Act of 1996? Or even farther back, the attempts of the government to shutdown the release of the Pentagon Papers? No single country has even been safe from censorship or even seizure. |
| tuxchick Mar 23, 2009 9:38 AM CST |
McCarthy, Prohibition, the Hayes Office, pre-Miranda, cramming "under God" into the Pledge of Allegience decades later, etc....for a free country, we sure have a hard time actually having freedom. |
| ColonelPanik Mar 23, 2009 9:44 AM CST |
TC: Amen, er, unless amen bothers you. Sheeze. tc, that was for others
among us who ain't happy. Remember: No mater how paranoid or conspiracy minded you are, what your government is actually doing is worse than you can imagine. |
| tuxtom Mar 24, 2009 1:26 AM CST |
We still have Prohibition, tc. Looks like it won't be for much longer, though. |
| azerthoth Mar 24, 2009 9:17 AM CST |
@TC & TT, more flame bait ... and intentional at that. |
| tuxtom Mar 25, 2009 1:55 AM CST |
@azerthoth: Case in point. |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!