It all depends on who is telling the story
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| Ridcully Dec 22, 2011 4:57 AM EDT |
This article seems to indicate a major win for Apple. On the other hand, this article in the Groklaw news clips on the right hand side of the page, does not: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-21/htc-completed-worka... And PJ has added some very interesting notes to the effect that due to these court actions, Apple lost 9 patents and even the one that has been held up is being worked around virtually immediately. PJ's take is that things are going quite well. So who's right ? |
| rahulsundaram Dec 22, 2011 5:55 AM EDT |
Both are right. Apple did win but won only one past. HTC did win because HTC invalidated the majority of the claim. |
| JaseP Dec 22, 2011 10:54 AM EDT |
And, they still didn't litigate the validity of the patent ... There's prior art all over that patent, dating back to Borland's 1983 Sidekick software. |
| dinotrac Dec 22, 2011 12:00 PM EDT |
Yup. Not a final disposition, except that htc finds it easier and cheaper to work around the single claim that was upheld. Certainly not a decision that would encourage Apple to tacle Google head-on. |
| caitlyn Dec 22, 2011 1:57 PM EDT |
Off topic, but... Sidekick was a brilliant piece of software in its day. I hadn't thought about that one in a long time. Oh, and yeah, JaseP is right. It's almost certainly prior art that applies to this case. |
| JaseP Dec 22, 2011 5:08 PM EDT |
I can't take credit for that rediscovery. Someone else brought it up in talk backs on another blog... |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!