LOL
|
| Author | Content |
|---|---|
| vhbil Aug 27, 2012 9:18 PM CST |
This could benefit Samsung :) |
| djohnston Aug 27, 2012 9:55 PM CST |
Backfire! |
| BernardSwiss Aug 27, 2012 10:40 PM CST |
Did I forget to include the link? Maybe it was one of those http/https things... http://plus.google.com/u/0/114476892281222708332/posts/246sr... |
| tracyanne Aug 28, 2012 3:02 AM CST |
Warms my heart it does. |
| notbob Aug 28, 2012 7:06 AM CST |
What? That Apple owners are too stupid to realize Samsung is basically the same, yet costs half as much? Nobody ever accused Apple-colytes of having any common sense. ;) |
| Bob_Robertson Aug 28, 2012 8:24 AM CST |
Wait, Apple customers read newspapers? |
| jdixon Aug 28, 2012 8:51 AM CST |
> Wait, Apple customers read newspapers? True Apple-ites only read them on their iPhone or iPad, but they've been known to, yes. |
| gus3 Aug 28, 2012 10:17 AM CST |
They only read the New York Times, according to Apple's ads. |
| 750 Aug 28, 2012 10:30 AM CST |
Strange, i would think that the Wall Street Journal was the newspaper for Apple-ites. |
| Fettoosh Aug 28, 2012 11:04 AM CST |
Yeah, they read the paper when their hands and eyes are exhausted from flip flopping all over back and forth using their iPhones and iPads accomplishing nothing. |
| JaseP Aug 28, 2012 12:32 PM CST |
This could be some kind of "Barbara Streisand"-like effect... It would be funny if people started buying more Samsung as a result of the verdict's publicity. |
Posting in this forum is limited to members of the group: [ForumMods, SITEADMINS, MEMBERS.]
Becoming a member of LXer is easy and free. Join Us!