My latest warning against dual- and triple-booting Linux and BSDs
|
|
|
Comments (13)
Once they're all re-defined by M$ as "primary partitions," does it matter?
gus3
It's not what MS says., because...............bla bla
Do you know a way ( any way ) of putting 5 primary partitions on " one " hard drive ? I really would like to know
Nikkels
Do you know a way ( any way ) of putting 5 primary partitions on " one " hard drive ? I really would like to know
Nikkels
nikkels: You can't. It's in the very definition of "partition". If 3 plus one extended isn't good enough for you then you need some other scheme like slices or disklabels.
Sander
I know !! It's the fact that he wrote " in linux, as far as I know " which made me comment
Note: If I knew where the " bold" , " italic" , " underline " etc was , my post would have been clearer than now. Sorry
I know !! It's the fact that he wrote " in linux, as far as I know " which made me comment
Note: If I knew where the " bold" , " italic" , " underline " etc was , my post would have been clearer than now. Sorry
IIRC you can simply use HTML.
I tried to use the normal html tags ..etc.., but they never work
My apologies if I look stupid today.
My apologies if I look stupid today.
HTML tags are with < and > (see http://w3schools.com/html/default.asp), not with [ and ]. That's BBCode: http://www.bbcode.org/
See, it works!
See, it works!
WOO-HOO!!!!
:P
:P
Sander
Thanks a lot
rijelkentaurus I think you got a problem.
Thanks a lot
rijelkentaurus I think you got a problem.
A? :p
Any disk-dividing system (partitions, slices, etc.) is only a data placement convention for the sake of software cross-compatibility. If you don't mind breaking that cross-compatibility, you can store the disk divisions anyway, anywhere you want.
The only requirement is that the boot disk contain proper boot code in the first sector. If it's your own hacked-up boot code, so be it. The BIOS only cares that the last two bytes are 0x55 and 0xAA. The interpretation of the partition table is left to the code in the MBR.
[Edit:] The above is true for a PC, and maybe some other hardware platforms. However, EFI, Open Boot PROM, and GUID partition tables do rely on having partition data in fixed locations on the hard disk. PA-RISC-based HP systems actually have UFS code in PROM, to load OS boot code directly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booting#Boot_sequence_on_standa...
The only requirement is that the boot disk contain proper boot code in the first sector. If it's your own hacked-up boot code, so be it. The BIOS only cares that the last two bytes are 0x55 and 0xAA. The interpretation of the partition table is left to the code in the MBR.
[Edit:] The above is true for a PC, and maybe some other hardware platforms. However, EFI, Open Boot PROM, and GUID partition tables do rely on having partition data in fixed locations on the hard disk. PA-RISC-based HP systems actually have UFS code in PROM, to load OS boot code directly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booting#Boot_sequence_on_standa...
Thanks to all of those, here and elsewhere, who pointed out that the four-primary-partition limit is a "legacy" of MS-DOS.
I should probably make the move to LVM and leave all this loveliness behind me.
I should probably make the move to LVM and leave all this loveliness behind me.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

And how many primary partitions do you have in windows ?
:-)