Advanced

The Linux Desktop Mess

Posted by Dietrich on · 6 comments
linuxadvocates.com; By Dietrich Schmitz
Mail this story
Print this story

Today something struck home and really punctuates the current state of affairs we now have with Linux Desktops. Insync 1.0 was introduced, which, by itself, is a good thing, particularly because Google chose to pass on writing a Drive client for Linux but provided one for Microsoft Windows and Apple OSX last Spring of 2012. That's to be expected I guess. After all, they represent two very big markets with essentially one codebase for each operating system--fairly simple in view of long-term maintenance. I think that's a safe assumption.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Groups: Standards

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (6)

Oh God! Not another call for standardization! Please,... 1999 is calling and wants its tired old mantra back. I like diversity. If I didn't, I wouldn't be using Linux, I'd be using MAC or (wretch!) Windows...
Reading the comments, it looks to me like he's furiously backing off from what his article actually says.

Every once in awhile, some need to be reminded that FOSS is a natural process and evolution is its method of change.

Just like nature, we have so many different types of trees, animals, humans, etc. but guided by nature's laws and principles, so does FOSS.

Some stay the same, others change and develop, some new ones come along and others die off. That is why nature lasted for so long, so will FOSS.

Correct me if I'm wrong but the theory behind the Linux diversity is... forks and competing projects appear when there is a differing technical opinion or when individual needs are not being met. However eventually most of this should get reconciled and we should and up with one or a few dominant projects.

It seems to me the community has been forking and diverging quite a bit lately but not coming to compromises or killing off weak projects. I am hoping to see the GTK desktop environment forks come to a point where one or two of them die off.

As for the distros third parties can choose to support however many distros they want but they often support just a few. I think this is becoming self reinforcing whether or not a dominant distro is the best distro they have a lot of support by third parties, therefore users go there, and then they get a lot of support from third parties. So even if there were a million distros only a few will end up being dominant and the dominant ones will become difficult to unseat.
Projects die when developers abandon them,... Otherwise, what defines what is weak, and what is strong, anyway?! To bottom line it,... You only need a few active developers to make for a healthy project. So fork away & to your heart's content...
Quoting:Ask your Distro support channel if they are LSB-certified.


OK. "Self, are you LSB-certified?" Self:"No, now quit bugging me about stupid stuff."

Seriously though, the only time I've had problems with paid third-party software and Linux is when I had the machine integrated with Microsoft Active Directory.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post