Supreme Court hears aftermath of long-dead DMCA printer cartridge case
A case that went before the Supreme Court yesterday has a very long history. Lexmark sued Static Control Components in 2002, arguing that SCC shouldn't be allowed to reverse-engineer its printers and help others create replacement toner cartridges, because of copyright law. In 2004, an appeals court ruled in favor of SCC, and that ruling has become a cornerstone of DMCA-era copyright law.
|
|
Full Story |
This topic does not have any threads posted yet!
You cannot post until you login.