Latest CAFC Ruling Suggests A Whole Lot Of Software Patents Are Likely Invalid
|
Some more good news on the patent front. Following the Supreme Court's ruling last month in the Alice v. CLS Bank case, there has been some question about how the lower courts would now look at software patents. As we noted, the Supreme Court's ruling would seem to technically invalidate nearly all software patents by basically saying that if a patent "does no more than require a generic computer to perform generic computer functions" then it's no longer patentable. But that, of course, is basically all that software does. Still, the Supreme Court's ruling also insisted that plenty of software was still patentable, but it didn't give any actual examples.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140717/14503027923/lates...
|
|
Full Story |
This topic does not have any threads posted yet!
You cannot post until you login.
