What If Windows Went Open Source?
Now I do realize this is hardly considered to be anything groundbreaking with regard to the software company's closed source nature. Regardless, there are those among us that did feel like they might be rethinking part of their old position. |
|
|
Comments (15)
If Windows went open source....
The author completely misses the point. Access to the source code is only a small part of the strength of FLOSS. Its real value comes from the license, which is the one thing that Microsoft will never give up control of.
Copyright 'screens' right now. Otherwise I bet it will be the name of the new MS AV ;-)...
The real biggest strenght, benefit and difference of GNU/Linux as compared to Windows is not in the technical architecture of the it as an operating system, but the license and the freedom that it offers.
And that cause is apparently larger than this one Free OS itself. The real battle here is not between Windows and GNU/Linux, but between proprietary software and Free Software. GNU/Linux and Windows just happen to be the sort of flag bearers of the two.
...we would die laughing
1. way too much misappropriated code 2. way too much really really really bad code
Want a little red wine with that spaghetti?
You are SO UNFAIR!!!!
I'll have you know, that Microsoft has already released every non-humiliating line of code in Windows.
As of yet, they don't need an ftp site.
Day could come, though.
You mean all the BSD?
Nah...the BSD code is pretty humiliating -- to Microsoft.
So far, their repository has a file a with a copyright notice in it....
I know dino, I know :)
Well, I guess that makes the file much, much bigger. ;-)
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
