Advanced

ODF editor: ODF loses if OOXML does

Posted by Sander_Marechal on · 4 comments
InfoWorld; By Chris Kanaracus
Mail this story
Print this story

The editor of the Open Document Format (ODF) standard has written a letter that strongly supports recognizing Microsoft's Open Office XML (OOXML) file format as a standard, arguing that if it fails, ODF will suffer. As the editor of OpenDocument, I want to promote OpenDocument, extol its features, urge the widest use of it as possible, none of which is accomplished by the anti-OpenXML position in ISO," Patrick Durusau wrote. "The bottom line is that OpenDocument, among others, will lose if OpenXML loses. ... Passage of OpenXML in ISO is going to benefit OpenDocument as much as anyone else."

[More FUD from Patrick. How did he become an ODF editor? - Sander]

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Editorial; Groups: Microsoft

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (4)

and only if OOXML is promulgated as a proper standard and, even then, only if Microsoft commits to actually use it for Office.

Under those circumstances, OOXML would be a boon to everyone, Microsoft included.

The current nasty mess, however, not.
The only way to mould OOXML into something resembling a proper standard is a rejection of DIS 29500 and the a resubmit of Ecma 376 through the normal, slow track ISO process.
Sander --

Even apart from the process, isn't the proposed standard itself infected with proprietary binary-isms?

The surest test of a usable OOXML standard would be the ability to construct any complete document that can be created by the software based solely on information in the standard alone, and, if I understand correctly, that isn't the case right now.
Indeed. That's most certainly isn't the case now. But hand it over to ISO in the non-fast-track process, let them hammer on if for a year or 2-3 and maybe, maybe something nice and usable could come out of it. Of course, the odds are that ISO will simply lift the few bits that are not part of ODF yet and put them in ODF. Problem solved. And in under a year too!

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post