BRM Blowback

Posted by Andy_Updegrove on Apr 2, 2008 5:29 PM EDT
ConsortiumInfo.org Standards Blog; By Andy Updegrove 		Mail this story
Print this story

Now that the OOXML vote is over, what can we learn, and what should happen next? It is impossible to avoid the conclusion that the credibility and integrity of the formal standards development process has suffered serious damage as a result of what has just transpired. While that process may serve perfectly well under less contentious circumstances, reforms are obviously needed to address those exceptional circumstances in which greater protections are needed.

In order for the credibility of the traditional system to be restored, a thorough review of the just completed DIS 29500 Fast Track process should be immediately commissioned. That review should include recommendations for reform that would include, but not be limited to, suggesting revisions to the rules relating to Fast Track and PAS submissions, new National Body and ISO/IEC JTC1 rules relating to transparency and conflicts of interest, and providing for circuit breakers and corrective actions that could be invoked the next time such a process has clearly run off the rails.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Editorial; Groups: Microsoft

« Return to the newswire homepage

Subject Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
"apart from individuals" henke54 2 1,311 Apr 3, 2008 4:30 AM

You cannot post until you login.