Google Chrome: not faster, safer or smaller after all
|
|
|
Comments (6)
...of taking a just released Beta Product and ripping it to shreds by comparing it with Full Release products (except for IE8, also a beta)?
I mean, it's one thing to go over some initial tests and such to see how things are starting out, but this article was just vicious.
No kidding. Is this going to turn into a KDE4-style hyena attack?
Well, at least Google will probably keep the "beta" moniker for much, much longer than KDE did...
Heh, I thought "Beta" was part of the name of each of their products. Gmail is still "Beta".
Being advertised on http://www.google.com, it's quite high-profile for a beta, though :)
tuxchick --
Hmmm. Around where I live, it's coyotes. So...until Chrome grows up and can take care of itself, I guess we'd better not let it outside to do its business.
Hmmm. Around where I live, it's coyotes. So...until Chrome grows up and can take care of itself, I guess we'd better not let it outside to do its business.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
