Advanced

Does Linux Deliver For Small Businesses?

Posted by tuxchick on · 6 comments
Linux Today; By Carla Schroder
Mail this story
Print this story

The answer is Yes, it does, though with some qualifications. The short answer: it's all in the implementation. The long answer starts with taking a look at Canonical's successes in opening new doors for Linux deployments.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Editorial; Groups: Community, Debian, Ubuntu

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (6)

Quote: "The two most important bits are friendly, skilled, reliable support, and visibility. Canonical have done a great job at raising Linux's visibility. As for support, we can learn lessons from successful businesses: the successful ones wrap up everything in a nice tidy package, make it pretty, and do a lot of handholding. In contrast, an all-too-typical Linux experience is "Here's a Linux CD, now dump Windows and use Linux, and hit Google when you have problems." That doesn't work. I've known Apple fans to do the same thing-- they'll talk a friend or relative into dumping Windows for a Mac, and then they think that's enough. But it's not because there is still a learning curve, both in learning how to use the machine, and learning what other software is available. It's a whole different world."

Right again TC : The RTFM method of support doesn't work, and really never did.
> The RTFM method of support doesn't work,

Especially when the user doesn't even know how to find the "FM". It can work, if you point out how to find the relevant information, explain how they could have found it themselves, and (in many cases) explain what it means in terms they can understand.
Or if the user does'n know what RTFM means at all.
Oops, I did it again. RTFM was used as an example of attitude, not the act of reading the FM it self.

The fact is, most "users" just don't do computers like the people who build/fix/program/etc.

jd said, "and (in many cases) explain what it means in terms they can understand." Yes, that says it all, some of us need a manual to explain what the FM says.



> RTFM was used as an example of attitude, not the act of reading the FM it self.

That's what I assumed from your context.
jd, Thanks, but when I reread my post I sounded a little off key. I need to hire a writer.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post