Advanced

Canonical vs. Microsoft: Netbook Cat Fight

Posted by thevarguy2 on · 3 comments
The VAR Guy
Mail this story
Print this story

The VAR Guy loves cat fights as much as the next guy. Jennifer Aniston vs. Angelina Jolie? Classic but a bit dated. Canonical vs. Microsoft? Not quite as sexy, but certainly timely and just as much fun. The latest spat involves Canonical dismissing Microsoft’s claims in the netbook market. But both Canonical and Microsoft are missing the bigger picture.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Groups: Microsoft, Ubuntu

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (3)

Quoting:Regardless of which operating system you choose, some netbooks come with cheap keyboards, lousy batteries and other money saving items that deliver less-than-stellar user experiences.


That's the reason those things are so cheap, don't you think?

You see it when you compare a Suzuki to a Volkswagen of the same price: The Suzuki has tons of extra accessories a Volkswagen of the same price doesn't have. When comparing two of them with the same accessoires, the Volkswagen will be much more expensive.

The difference - why the Suzuki is cheaper - can be found in the quality of the materials used, of which the plastic is a good example. I own a Suzuki, and when screwing some screws through the plastic to mount new speakers, the cheap plastic broke, the same goes for some suspension-cover caps in the trunk; they also break really easy. The carpet in the interior becomes loose from the sides, and the whole car squeaks and beeps a bit. Nonetheless I'm happy, because I couldn't afford a Volkswagen with the same accessories.

This happens in cheaper consumer products too. Some of the plastics used at the company where I work costs more than $150 per kilo, which for plastic is really expensive. That's why the interior products our company makes will last at least seven years, while the cheaper ones which doesn't have that expensive plastic will break far sooner. However, from the outside the difference can't be seen.

All of this is no problem as long as the user knows less money buys less quality. If they however expect a stellar experience for $150, that could mean trouble.
Quoting:All of this is no problem as long as the user knows less money buys less quality. If they however expect a stellar experience for $150, that could mean trouble.


Until you come to software, where the experience is usually reversed. Although actually it does apply until you get to Free and Open Source, then it's reversed.
Yeah, software is one of the only branches where cheap 'raw materials' can make end products of good quality which may exceed products made by expensive 'raw materials'.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post