Ready to be published? LXer is read by around 350,000 individuals each month, and is an excellent place for you to publish your ideas, thoughts, reviews, complaints, etc. Do you have something to say to the Linux community?
When I saw the title, I assumed that this was a somewhat advanced book and not for the reader who was learning JavaScript for the first time. I work for a company that develops web applications, and they make extensive use of JavaScript. Each of the developers is well versed in JavaScript and other web programming languages, and I thought this was a JavaScript book for the experienced programmer. With that assumption in place, I was surprised to see a comment on the back of the book state "One of the best introductions to JavaScript" (from a pre-publication review by Raymond Wisman, Indiana University Southeast). An "introduction" to JavaScript? Even a casual scanning of the back cover reveals that the book is supposed present a vast cornucopia of JavaScript related topics. Deitel and Deitel have written quite a number of programming books, so I was interested to see if this indeed was a book where one could learn JavaScript from scratch.
The Deitels have written a significant number of "How to Program" books for languages including C, C++, Java, and Visual Basic, but no "How to" book appears on their website (until this one apparently) for JavaScript. Why not "JavaScript How to Program" instead of "JavaScript for Programmers" if this is a beginner's book?
I stopped reading this review after finding out that it covered a "Deitel and Deitel" book. They're serial authors, and I mean that in the worst way. The original Deitel was an IBM'er from long ago, and he wrote books about MVS and "structured programming" and goofy old mainframe topics.
Now, he, his son and maybe even his grandson, just write books on whatever topic they think will make them money. Buy any of their books and you will get the worst kind of hackneyed corporate rubbish you can imagine. A book like this is an analog of proprietary software, performed only for money.
Spend your money on Douglas Crockford's "JavaScript the Good Parts" http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0596517742/wrrrldwide... instead. Crockford is not some corporate mindset, 9-to-5'er: he actually likes and uses JavaScript, and he exercises a sense of aesthetics when choosing "good parts" and "bad parts". He wrote his book from experience. Crockford's book is an analog of open source software.
Edited: I changed "moral equivalent" to "analog" based on Azerthoth's criticism below. Thanks, Azerthoth, I will never look at the phrase "moral equivalent" the same way again.
Interesting, although I truly wish that people would stop using the word moral in conjunction with much of anything. Whose morals, from what back ground? Tossing that word out there in any argument is the equivalent of a verbal/literary land mine under the feet of everyone nearby.
No I don't believe that you can define a contextual basis for it either in common speech. The word is too vague, meaningless, and used mostly in an inflammatory way, often incorrectly.
My new thing is Javascript (this week, anyway) ... I'm using little bits of it here and there -- I hacked together a couple of scripts already to make my work easier to do -- and I'm anxious to learn more. I'm starting with the "Missing Manual" book on Javascript ...
phsolide, no probs, I just re-read my comment and I seem to have come off a bit over the top. It was offered up as friendly commentary but it doesnt come across to me that way. I guess thats what I get for posting on my way out the door to go do something else.
@Steven: Whatever you do, I highly recommend you read/try a couple of jQuery tutorials as well. It's fantastic and makes Javascript fun and easy again!
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Now, he, his son and maybe even his grandson, just write books on whatever topic they think will make them money. Buy any of their books and you will get the worst kind of hackneyed corporate rubbish you can imagine. A book like this is an analog of proprietary software, performed only for money.
Spend your money on Douglas Crockford's "JavaScript the Good Parts" http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0596517742/wrrrldwide... instead. Crockford is not some corporate mindset, 9-to-5'er: he actually likes and uses JavaScript, and he exercises a sense of aesthetics when choosing "good parts" and "bad parts". He wrote his book from experience. Crockford's book is an analog of open source software.
Edited: I changed "moral equivalent" to "analog" based on Azerthoth's criticism below. Thanks, Azerthoth, I will never look at the phrase "moral equivalent" the same way again.