Advanced

Software SmackDown: SoftMaker Comes Out on Top

Posted by Andy_Updegrove on · 3 comments
ConsortiumInfo.org Standards Blog; By Andy Updegrove
Mail this story
Print this story

Who offers the most credible competitor to Microsoft Office today? One reviewer's answer will surprise you.

The dominance of Microsoft's Office in the marketplace would be logical (if frustrating, to those that think that competition breeds better products), if it was simply a matter of developer seats. After all, Microsoft deployed hundreds, and then thousands of engineers to develop and evolve its flagship app over the last 25 years. How could anyone expect a less well funded commercial competitor, much less an open source project, to equal Office for features, performance and interoperability with other office suites?

At the same time, people keep trying - a lot of them. Not just long-established competitors, like Corel, with the venerable and estimable WordPerfect office suite it bought from Novell, open source projects like OpenOffice and KOffice, as well as projects launched by much larger players, such as IBM (Lotus Symphony) and Google (Docs).

Surprisingly enough, though, a review in InfoWorld finds that not OpenOffice, the most publicly acknowledged challenger to Office, but tiny SoftMaker - with only 17 employees - may have the best horse in this high-stakes race.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Groups: IBM, Microsoft, Novell; Story Type: News Story

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (3)

Did anyone else notice that the link for Lotus Symphony didn't lead to the IBM website for the office suite and didn't lead to the appropriate WikiPedia page but rather went to the WikiPedia page for the 1980s DOS-based office suite? It kind of makes you question the accuracy of everything in the article, which I do anyway.

I am not interested in touting another closed, proprietary office suite to replace MS Office. For my personal use and business use OpenOffice has actually done a really good job with MS Office documents. If a document is large and complex and likely to be mangled by OpenOffice converting it to an MS Office file I save as a PDF which is pretty universally readable. That always seems to work.
I have no trouble at all with OpenOffcie.org. I used it recently to repair a Word 2007 Document, that was mangled in Word 2007. It would be nice if development was a bit faster, maybe, not holding breath or anything silly like that, development will go a bit faster, now that Sun Politics no longer play their part. But then again there's Oracle politics.
I have been working with some rather complicated .dot templates under OOo and I have to agree with Andy Updegrove: OOo's import filters and export filters for .dot/.doc have a *lot* of bugs. Some of them have been solved in 3.1 but since 3.1 has a pretty major regression with sorting spreadsheets, OOo 3.1 isn't really an option for most companies.

The issue in question is this one: http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101690

It's fixed in 3.1.1 but that isn't out yet. Plus, most companies will want it to be out for some time before they are going to roll it out company-wide.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post