Advanced

Microsoft's monopoly crumbling

Posted by tomi30 on · 11 comments
idreamoflinux.com
Mail this story
Print this story

Microsoft's monopoly is being threatened from all sides. In the past, Microsoft used to be untouchable. Today, things seem to be shifting drastically. Microsoft still has a monopoly on the desktop computer market but it is being threatened from numerous sides. The latest threat is coming from Google who is creating their own operating system and competing head on with Microsoft Windows.

In the past, Microsoft used to be untouchable. Today, things seem to be shifting drastically. Microsoft still has a monopoly on the desktop computer market but it is being threatened from numerous sides. The latest threat is coming from Google who is creating their own operating system and competing head on with Microsoft Windows.

We knew that this would happen one day and it is finally here. Will Google be able to cut away at Microsoft's monopoly in the OS market? Microsoft is a large company and has been dominant for a very long time. They have a lot of money behind them and established contacts with hardware and software makers. It will not be an easy task for Google to take market share away from Microsoft but they will definitely try. Google is a search engine king and they too have huge financing behind them. This battle of the OS will be a tough and very competitive one. However, if any one will be able to compete with an established and large company such as Microsoft, it is definitely Google. They have a lot of innovation, financing, and know how to compete with an established giant.

Microsoft's monopoly is not being threatened by Google alone. There are a lot of companies that are trying to get more market share at the expense of Microsoft. Apple computers has been marketing their products extensively and they are popular among people. Microsoft is definitely losing customers to Apple. Apple makes quality hardware, stylish and easy to use computers. Apple has become a huge brand that a lot of chic individuals want. Some people are just tired of Windows and are looking for alternatives to switch to. Apple brand seems to be everywhere and is an easy switch for most users.

GNU/Linux is also a huge threat to Microsoft. They do not have a large market share but they continue to grow and GNU/Linux is definitely picking up momentum. It is not only for hobbyist and tweakers anymore but for users of all types. Even Google's new Chrome OS will be built on the Linux kernel. Microsoft will have a hard time competing with GNU/Linux because of several factors. GNU/Linux is not only one operating system. There are hundreds of them out there and they are all unique. They appeal to different users. It is hard to create one operating system that can satisfy everyone. That is why GNU/Linux distributions have an upper hand because they can create an OS for a particular user in mind. Also, open-source software is much easier to modify than proprietary software, so it can quickly adapt to new trends. There are already some established distributions that are getting at Microsoft's monopoly on the desktop. These are Ubuntu, Mint Linux, Debian, Fedora, Open Suse, Mandriva and many others.

Gadgets are also threatening Microsoft. Things are shifting drastically in computers and the action is not only on the desktop. A lot of people are using different gadgets to get on the web and for computing. Cell phones have become mini computers that run their own OS. Netbooks are very popular and need a lightweight operating system. Tablet computers and many other devices are running their own software and are bypassing the desktop computer and Microsoft Windows.

Microsft's monopoly is being threatened from all sides. This is a good thing for consumers. Microsoft will not be able to charge the ridiculous amount of money for their software anymore. They will have to change and adopt if they would still like to be an important player in the future. The old ways of gauging customers for huge amounts of cash will not work anymore. There are plenty of alternatives today and customers are switching to these. Microsoft is slowly crumbling and becoming less and less relevant. Now with Google Chrome OS taking its aim at Microsoft, it is inevitable for this large monopoly to finally fall apart.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Editorial; Groups: Linux, Microsoft

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (11)

I think that most of the writings, blogs, etc. on how Microsoft is going to die (sometimes it is claimed to happen REALLY soon) and how Free Software or Open Source will take over world are mostly unjustified.

The most critical example I know of is the server market. We have been hearing on how GNU/Linux gains ground and stuffs, but let's take a closer look to it: GNU/Linux has essentially wiped out Unix competitors, and Microsoft (surprised!) holds bigger market share last time I check. Now, given that GNU/Linux and Apache has, by now, dominate the Webserver segment (no number to back this, but mostly anecdote experience), Windows must have dominated everything else, such as internal servers for businesses, email servers, etc.

We should acknowledge this: although Windows is inferior to GNU/Linux in any perceivable way, Microsoft has a whole solution to offer. Lowest level they have Windows, then .NET, then Office and Share Point, then Exchange coupled with Outlook. Next, they also have advertisement, FUD, and inertia. In comparisons, last time I check, there is no viable replacement for anything above .NET level (Windows GNU/Linux base; .NET Java; anything else?). At the highest level (social and marketing stuffs), GNU/Linux is no competitor of Microsoft. Even the "community" is divided into tribes (Free Software vs. Open Source; Mono; GPL vs. BSD; proprietary-tolerant vs. non-tolerant; etc.), the new influx of adopters are making some ridiculous demands ("Why is there not setup.exe?", "Why are there choices?", "Why can I not remain stupid and ignorant?"), and then more division over how to solve these problems.

Meanwhile, Apple is making some headway, and it has promised to be much more effective tyrants than Microsoft can ever be. The approaching Chrome OS of Google (actually, this starts with Android, but since that thing has not been caught up yet, it has not created as much mess as it could have) threatens to outgrow Linux from GNU, and materialize the division between the two major camps of Free Software and Open Source (NO, I AM NOT AGAINST CHROME OS. I would love to see it grow, but the prospect of its effects is terrifying).

Thus, a world dominant with Free and/or Open Source Software is still a distant dream.
I think that's a pretty good assessment, magice. Though I suspect that actual Linux/FOSS market share is under-estimated in all segments.

So the real barriers are psychological rather than technical. Humans are such wacky little things.

> ...Microsoft is going to die...

Microsoft isn't going to die. There are people still running VMS. People still use mainframes. People still use Cobol. Old technology doesn't die. It slowly withers away until there's no hardware left to run it, and even then people develop emulators for it. And there will always be a market for Microsoft's brand of tightly integrated solutions. In some cases, it's even the best solution to business needs.

Microsoft's monopoly is what's going to die, and it's already well on it's way. They've lost their hoped for monopoly in the server market before it even started. Apple and Linux now have somewhere between 10 to 25 % of the desktop market, and growing.

Microsoft is going to become a niche market OS, aimed at specific uses and applications. The exact size of that niche is debatable, but it does and will exist. What they shouldn't be, and hopefully won't be, is a general purpose OS for home/business use. That's a role far better filled by Linux.
jdixon, I don't care if it's Linux or something else entirely, as long as it is open, good-quality, and not the product of a company run by psyche cases who would have been equally at home looting and plundering the old-fashioned ways, like on horseback with spears.
TC, I don't think I could agree more. :)
Humans are such wacky little things.

I alternate between wry irony and near fits of rage when I am reminded by comments such as Magice....

We are the largest inhibitor to our adaptation on the desktop. It seems that not only is freedom built into our system but the same inertia we find in the Enterprise, bogs our forward motion to a crawl. We advance none-the-less but cheese whiz on a freakin' cracker...

We could have been so much farther ahead by now if it wasn't for us.

h
@magice: What is the source for your figures on the server market? Commercial UNIX is still about 19% last I checked. Microsoft, according to Steve Ballmer, is at 40%, down from 42% in 2000. Linux plus UNIX account for nearly 60%. An argument based on incorrect data is usually wrong.

What solution does Microsoft offer that Linux cannot offer? You didn't list any. You just threw around some MS product names but didn't come up with a reason why they make an integrated solution for which there is no FOSS competitor.

Methinks the emperor has no clothes.
Quoting:What solution does Microsoft offer that Linux cannot offer?


Until Samba 4 arrives, Active Directory. And don't forget SharePoint. Yes, it's a bad product designed solely to promote lock-in, but for the people who want it there is no integrated alternative. It's possible to achieve the same functionality on Linux using various products but it's still a lot of work putting that together.

Of course, the real solution to the latter part is to educate sysadmins to the value of decoupled systems :-)
Sander, wouldn't a slick management interface sit nicely on top of all those decoupled bits? Something like Webmin, only better.
That would work yes. Someone would need to build it though. Or better, provide a distro or package that installs it and it's dependencies out-of-the-box. Bonus points for supplying VM images that corporate sysadmins can download and run with 10 or less clicks :-)
@Sander A lot of people think that Alfresco is a pretty good alternative to Sharepoint, a.k.a. "Selfishpoint". You can replicate most of Active Directory functionality with a mix of open source stuff, including mostly compatibility but right now it takes a little work to put it all together. tuxchick's suggestion and your additions of making a distro and/or VM images that make it easy are both excellent.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post