Advanced

Google's "reported attack site" nonsense could lead to a Firefox boycott

Posted by Libervis on · 7 comments
Nuxified.org; By Daniel Memenode
Mail this story
Print this story

"How am I to continue supporting the growth of Firefox if they're gonna chalk it up to Google to control what sites we should visit? They're putting us in a position from which supporting Firefox is getting to be equal to supporting Google's further grip on the market. That's NOT making me happy."

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Editorial; Groups: Community

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (7)

Can anyone here confim this.

This seems hard to believe. Does anyone else have this issue while browsing with FF3. I use opera so I can't test it.
It happened to me once.
I think that they majority of these sites have the "I Frame" spyware problem. At least the ones that are legitimate sites and get blocked. I had a client who was added to the list and he had a normal website but his server was compromised and "I Frames" were added that distributed spyware.

This can happen on Windows and Linux servers and be appended to otherwise legitimate sites.

See this example:

http://www.security-forums.com/viewtopic.php?t=53109

This is happening all the time.
I have turned that "feature" off in Firefox. I'm perfectly able to determine for myself which sites are problematic and which are not. An of course, running on Linux means most attack sites don't do anything at all :-)
To turn it off in Firefox on Linux:

Edit/Preferences, then in the Preferences dialog click on Security in the top row, then un-check "Block reported attack sites" immediately underneath.

Turning this off also speeds up the page load.
I turned this off ages ago, as it causes I/O issues on one of my laptop's hard drives.

The article has numerous errors. First, the mozilla forum thread linked is mostly from 2008. Second the old myth "Linux users could care less for this "feature" since most malicious software doesn't affect them" is BS, since this is mainly targeted at protection against phishing, which is platform independent.

I can understand that webmasters can be angry, but really, it's your responsibility to make sure users are safe. Sure, the system isn't prefect, and may punish webmasters too much, but they shouldn't be so sloppy as to leave malicious links on their pages.

The examples cited have been corrected

The first problem has already been corrected (and is no longer flagged by Firefox), and the second example has apparently been shut down by AOL.

It seem Firefox and Google are doing their job.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post