Linux News
The world is talking about GNU/Linux and Free/Open Source Software
Are Microsoft to blame for "hidden" malware costs and will Windows 7 make any difference?
|
|
A couple of stories have hit the headlines this year concerning the huge cost that some UK Local Governments incurred when dealing with malware attack on their Windows machines. If you missed them, Manchester City Council had a single USB infected with the infamous Conficker worm and it cost them — brace yourself — £1.5m ($2.4m) of which £1.2m (US$1.9m) was spent on IT, of which a staggering £600,000 (US$980k) went on consultancy fees including money to Microsoft. A while later, Ealing Borough Council were hit with a cost of £500,000 (about US$ 800k) when they were also hit by a single USB stick containing conficker. Some in the industry tweeted and blogged this as being a “hidden cost of using Microsoft Windows”. In the ensuing discussion, many pointed out that the high cost was really due to the lack of a proper patching and disaster recovery policy at the council. So which is right? Is dealing with malware a hidden cost of using Windows or of a poor IT strategy? Read the full article at Free Software Magazine.
|
|
Full Story |
| Subject |
Topic Starter |
Replies |
Views |
Last Post |
| not really hidden |
tuxchick |
5 |
1,030 |
Nov 9, 2009 12:03 AM |
You cannot post until you login.
