Poisoned Apple?
|
|
|
Comments (2)
I don't know who associates Linux with free as in freeloader. Red Hat makes healthy profits year after year selling to Linux business users. Ubuntu's strategy seems to be to do the same to consumers, whether it's selling music or online storage. Simon Brew essentially makes that point: just because the OS is free doesn't mean he or anyone else should expect to get copyrighted material for free, whether it's a music mp3 or an e-book.
It seems to me that the perception of Linux is what needs to change, not moving to a scaled back, limited functionality distro like Android that eschews the Linux name. Oh, and yeah, I don't trust Google one little bit.
It seems to me that the perception of Linux is what needs to change, not moving to a scaled back, limited functionality distro like Android that eschews the Linux name. Oh, and yeah, I don't trust Google one little bit.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

And we know that Android is Linux with Marketing tags attached.