Advanced

MS Announces Support for Intel, AMD, and ARM SoC's for Next Windows

Posted by hkwint on · 2 comments
Microsoft PR
Mail this story
Print this story

LAS VEGAS — Jan. 5, 2011 — Microsoft Corp. today announced at 2011 International CES that the next version of Windows will support System on a Chip (SoC) architectures, including ARM-based systems from partners NVIDIA Corp., Qualcomm Inc. and Texas Instruments Inc. On the x86 architecture, Intel Corporation and AMD continue their work on low-power SoC designs that fully support Windows, including support for native x86 applications. SoC architectures will fuel significant innovation across the hardware spectrum when coupled with the depth and breadth of the Windows platform.

[For those of you asking what this has to do with open source: Most times ARM prototype SoC's are developed using Linux, like currently at NuFront (MS-partner), TI (think BeagleBord) and FreeScale. Only _after_ these prototypes run on Linux, they're going to receive Windows compatibility, meaning Windows will be some kind of 'afterthought' for some time. Of course, we don't know how long MS has been developing for ARM, but I'm pretty sure they're behind in ARM SoC support compared to Linux - also thanks to the Linaro initiative. And if not, at least we'll see a level playing field in which hardware doesn't work better with Windows than with Linux! - hkwint]

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Press Release, AMD; Groups: Kernel, Microsoft

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (2)

I remember the early days of Windows NT when no processor was considered unsuitable for Windows. As Intel took over the mainstream, the Win NT platforms diminished one by one until Intel was the only supported platform.

Zoom forward 10 years and now that other mass market processors are running non-Windows operating systems, all of a sudden, Windows becomes cross-architecture again.

Funny that!
Quoting:I remember the early days of Windows NT when no processor was considered unsuitable for Windows.


Depends on what you mean my "not unsuitable". I once used Windows on Alpha. Wow, what a dog!

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post