Recovering from motherboard failures, and clean computing
|
|
|
Comments (3)
Quoting:making a component that WILL get dirty in a way that it's not user serviceable, is to be working against the very customers to which one expects to sell product
I guess it's OK for the bean counters if the users are clueless enough. They'll just throw it out and buy a new one, Dirty fan fallacy ;)
> Dirty fan fallacy ;)
Before I had a spell checker, I used to spell that "phallacy". Much more appropriate for my opinion of most people in marketing and sales.
...and lawyers. No offense, Dino.
Before I had a spell checker, I used to spell that "phallacy". Much more appropriate for my opinion of most people in marketing and sales.
...and lawyers. No offense, Dino.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

The real worry is triple checking that it's unplugged first.
But seriously, making a component that WILL get dirty in a way that it's not user serviceable, is to be working against the very customers to which one expects to sell product!
Like that little GPU fan, just how much harder to make it "clip" into place rather than screw? Argh!
And I wonder, are electrostatic air movers really dangerous? Wouldn't that be a good way to make quiet systems? How about Tessla Turbines rather than fans?