Advanced

Strip mining of OpenOffice.org

Posted by russb78 on · 3 comments
Linux User & Developer magazine; By Richard Hillesley
Mail this story
Print this story

Oracle’s donation of the OpenOffice.org to the Apache Software Foundation does no favours for the users or developers of open office suites, says Richard Hillesley…

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: Editorial

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (3)

Last I looked, Apache was doing OK -- which is funny when you consider that IBM is a big contributor. Ditto for Linux.

Yes -- IBM likes to make money, but, so far -- it's been a pretty good corporate citizen. Free software rocks, and the Apache license is a non-copyleft free software license, but one that is copyleft-compatible. it has to be -- the apache license is so important that apache compatibility was one of the required criteria in drafting GPL 3.
Agreed. I got no beef with iBM. They are a pretty reliable defender/contributor to Linux. LibreOffice basically has all of OpenOffice but the proprietary IBM stuff. They don't need OpenOffice after the fork. Apache?!?! They need Linux/Unix/BSD as host OSes, but otherwise, what would they need to contribute??? This is a non-problem, looking for a non-solution.
Well, I think given all past discussion it was clear to any dev this was the drawback / risk of copyright-assignment to SUN.

I'm not sure if there's a non-problem, it's a bit sad the old project is fragmented now.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post