Strip mining of OpenOffice.org
|
|
|
Comments (3)
Agreed. I got no beef with iBM. They are a pretty reliable defender/contributor to Linux. LibreOffice basically has all of OpenOffice but the proprietary IBM stuff. They don't need OpenOffice after the fork. Apache?!?! They need Linux/Unix/BSD as host OSes, but otherwise, what would they need to contribute??? This is a non-problem, looking for a non-solution.
Well, I think given all past discussion it was clear to any dev this was the drawback / risk of copyright-assignment to SUN.
I'm not sure if there's a non-problem, it's a bit sad the old project is fragmented now.
I'm not sure if there's a non-problem, it's a bit sad the old project is fragmented now.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

Yes -- IBM likes to make money, but, so far -- it's been a pretty good corporate citizen. Free software rocks, and the Apache license is a non-copyleft free software license, but one that is copyleft-compatible. it has to be -- the apache license is so important that apache compatibility was one of the required criteria in drafting GPL 3.