- Site menu:
- Latest Discussions
- Latest Newswire
- Archives
- Submit Story
- Story HOWTO
- Syndicate
- E-mail Alerts
Synaptic Removed From Ubuntu 11.10
|
|
|
Comments (45)
25 earlier comments in the full thread.
Quoting:"You dance with the one that brung ya."
That would be Slackware then! Can't see Patrick using Unity anytime soon :)
> Can't see Patrick using Unity anytime soon :)
Oh, I could see him putting it in testing, as long as it didn't require Gnome.
Oh, I could see him putting it in testing, as long as it didn't require Gnome.
Quoting:Android is the only counter to Mac iOS in the tablet space, and Ubuntu might have a chance in that space. It's the longest of long shots at this point.
More in the realm of the possible would be reinvigorating the relationship with Dell (which started out with a quiet bang and quickly whimpered) and starting new ones with HP, Lenovo, Asus, etc.
If it doesn't happen, the whole thing falls apart.
Tablets are really just a two horse race, iOS and Android. Blackberry will fail and I really don't see Ubuntu competing with Android which already has its own app store. I see Windows 8 on tablets being more successful than either Blackberry or Ubuntu, but not significant compared to Android and Apple.
Relationships with big box vendors are not the beginning or end of Linux, though having at least a line of computers with Linux pre-installed would make inroads faster and easier. Linux's life doesn't depend on this though.
@smallboxadmin: "Relationships with big box vendors are not the beginning or end of Linux, though having at least a line of computers with Linux pre-installed would make inroads faster and easier. Linux's life doesn't depend on this though."
It sure helped Android. Only in that case, we are talking about wireless carriers.
It sure helped Android. Only in that case, we are talking about wireless carriers.
@skelband Apples and oranges, and not even that closely related.
@smallboxadmin: "Apples and oranges"
Eh? In what way? Care to clarify?
In the Android case, we have large commercial interests getting the platform and pushing it to the public domain and selling lots of boxes as a sexy competitor to iOS.
In the ideal Linux case, we would have Dell and their ilk pushing it as a sexy competitor to Windows.
The difference is that Dell etc have not really tried very hard. Android has Google as a technology sponsor ensuring its development. At the moment, we have Canonical trying hard to be Google in that equation. They are just not quite there yet, but it is definitely their goal. Their Android Marketplace is the Ubuntu Store.
There are more similarities than differences. The major difference is time.
Eh? In what way? Care to clarify?
In the Android case, we have large commercial interests getting the platform and pushing it to the public domain and selling lots of boxes as a sexy competitor to iOS.
In the ideal Linux case, we would have Dell and their ilk pushing it as a sexy competitor to Windows.
The difference is that Dell etc have not really tried very hard. Android has Google as a technology sponsor ensuring its development. At the moment, we have Canonical trying hard to be Google in that equation. They are just not quite there yet, but it is definitely their goal. Their Android Marketplace is the Ubuntu Store.
There are more similarities than differences. The major difference is time.
> Relationships with big box vendors are not the beginning or end of Linux, though having at least a line of computers with Linux pre-installed would make inroads faster and easier.
No, but it could be the beginning or end of Canonical.
No, but it could be the beginning or end of Canonical.
@jdixon
Well-put.
Well-put.
@skeband
The difference is Android needs hardware manufacturers and carriers for its success. It doesn't matter if Dell, HP, Lenovo, etc. sell pre-installed boxes, Linux is installed by the end users. Tablets and smart phones are pretty much closed systems by the hardware manufacturer, yes they can be jail broken or rooted, that's the exception. Linux does not need to be pre-installed in order to live.
Quoting:Eh? In what way? Care to clarify?
The difference is Android needs hardware manufacturers and carriers for its success. It doesn't matter if Dell, HP, Lenovo, etc. sell pre-installed boxes, Linux is installed by the end users. Tablets and smart phones are pretty much closed systems by the hardware manufacturer, yes they can be jail broken or rooted, that's the exception. Linux does not need to be pre-installed in order to live.
@jdixon
Canonical is shooting itself in the foot just fine on their own.
Quoting:No, but it could be the beginning or end of Canonical.
Canonical is shooting itself in the foot just fine on their own.
@smallboxadmin: "It doesn't matter if Dell, HP, Lenovo, etc. sell pre-installed boxes, Linux is installed by the end users. "
Again I disagree. The *vast majority* of PC owners do not do OS installations. The OS comes with the box that they buy from the big box shifters.
This is the big mistake and the main reason that Linux has not taken off on the desktop.
If Android was something that people installed onto bare hardware, no-one would have heard of it.
If Linux ever becomes popular on the desktop, it will be as an appliance (like Android to most people) and this is what Canonical are betting on and to be honest, I think that they are right. I just don't know how the market will end up with the situation being made much more blurred with the advent of the tablet. This is the reason why Canonical are going the Unity route. They are hedging their bets on tablets and desktops and assuming that they will all become one in the end. If I had some money to throw around, I would probably put some of it on that outcome. Not a lot, but a little.
As a techie user of Linux, what Canonical are doing is not for me. But then we are not typical computing consumers now. Once upon a time yes, but no more. We are far outnumbered by the casual computing crowd so it is where I would expect Canonical to go. Don't forget, it's about the apps and the services. The OS is just a means to an end for Canonical.
========================
My daughter is now a mobile "Linux" user. She bought an Android phone last night from someone on Craigslist. An LG Shine Pro. She absolutely loves it. Easy to use, intuitive and she says it is "beautiful". I have to agree. This is the way that Linux is changing the world. It's brought genuine joy to someone and that must be worth a smile or two.
Again I disagree. The *vast majority* of PC owners do not do OS installations. The OS comes with the box that they buy from the big box shifters.
This is the big mistake and the main reason that Linux has not taken off on the desktop.
If Android was something that people installed onto bare hardware, no-one would have heard of it.
If Linux ever becomes popular on the desktop, it will be as an appliance (like Android to most people) and this is what Canonical are betting on and to be honest, I think that they are right. I just don't know how the market will end up with the situation being made much more blurred with the advent of the tablet. This is the reason why Canonical are going the Unity route. They are hedging their bets on tablets and desktops and assuming that they will all become one in the end. If I had some money to throw around, I would probably put some of it on that outcome. Not a lot, but a little.
As a techie user of Linux, what Canonical are doing is not for me. But then we are not typical computing consumers now. Once upon a time yes, but no more. We are far outnumbered by the casual computing crowd so it is where I would expect Canonical to go. Don't forget, it's about the apps and the services. The OS is just a means to an end for Canonical.
========================
My daughter is now a mobile "Linux" user. She bought an Android phone last night from someone on Craigslist. An LG Shine Pro. She absolutely loves it. Easy to use, intuitive and she says it is "beautiful". I have to agree. This is the way that Linux is changing the world. It's brought genuine joy to someone and that must be worth a smile or two.
I have to add just a note here. I have an aSSociate who despises Linux. I don't mean he simply doesn't like it...he thinks Linux is Satan manifested in C. He absolutely hates the FOSS ideals. He works as a data entry specialist with the State of Texas and after listening to the millionth co-worker gush over their new Android, he followed suit and purchased on of the new HTC's with slide-out keyboard.
He came over to check on Diane's status and to visit a bit and spent some time showing me his new phone. I thought I was going to go all Tourettes on him and blurt it out but I remained calm and quietly informed him.
Android IS Linux
He actually thought an Android phone was based on Microsoft software.
His laugh was obligatory as he thought I was kidding...until I took his phone away from him and pulled up a google search with the search string: "Android is based on"...http://www.google.com/search?q=android+is+based+on&ie=UTF-8
I'm not kidding here...he actually blanched as he clicked the link and read the first paragraph.
I was not unkind...I did not laugh at him or rub it in...probably best that I didn't, I think he was capable of murder at that specific moment.
Just goes to show...a bit of research is a good thing prior to a purchase. Especially if you are techno-challenged.
Oh, I called him today and it rang once then went to voicemail. That means he hit "ignore" on his new Android phone.
He came over to check on Diane's status and to visit a bit and spent some time showing me his new phone. I thought I was going to go all Tourettes on him and blurt it out but I remained calm and quietly informed him.
Android IS Linux
He actually thought an Android phone was based on Microsoft software.
His laugh was obligatory as he thought I was kidding...until I took his phone away from him and pulled up a google search with the search string: "Android is based on"...http://www.google.com/search?q=android+is+based+on&ie=UTF-8
I'm not kidding here...he actually blanched as he clicked the link and read the first paragraph.
I was not unkind...I did not laugh at him or rub it in...probably best that I didn't, I think he was capable of murder at that specific moment.
Just goes to show...a bit of research is a good thing prior to a purchase. Especially if you are techno-challenged.
Oh, I called him today and it rang once then went to voicemail. That means he hit "ignore" on his new Android phone.
Just one question, helios: Does product research require more techno knowledge than the techno-challenged usually possess?
@helios: Priceless :D
@helios Sounds like my barber who says he refuses to own a computer (due to his fear that he'll waste too much time on it), but owns a Kindle. I keep telling him he does own a computer. I think we all pretty much understand that Android is Linux. However, maybe Google should say "Andriod, Powered by Linux".
@skelband My point was that Linux doesn't need big box vendors to survive. Of course more people would use it if it came pre-installed. As a result more software vendors would port/create more Linux apps too.
I never said or inferred that they did.
Here's where I disagree, I think third-party apps is why the Linux desktop has never taken off. I don't mean OpenOffice/LibreOffice, Gimp, I mean the wealth of business apps from ISV's that write for the Windows platform.
Obviously this hasn't been the case with desktop Linux.
@skelband My point was that Linux doesn't need big box vendors to survive. Of course more people would use it if it came pre-installed. As a result more software vendors would port/create more Linux apps too.
Quoting:Again I disagree. The *vast majority* of PC owners do not do OS installations. The OS comes with the box that they buy from the big box shifters
I never said or inferred that they did.
Quoting:This is the big mistake and the main reason that Linux has not taken off on the desktop.
Here's where I disagree, I think third-party apps is why the Linux desktop has never taken off. I don't mean OpenOffice/LibreOffice, Gimp, I mean the wealth of business apps from ISV's that write for the Windows platform.
Quoting:If Android was something that people installed onto bare hardware, no-one would have heard of it.
Obviously this hasn't been the case with desktop Linux.
@smallboxadmin:
"My point was that Linux doesn't need big box vendors to survive."
"Survival" is not the same as success. White rhinos "survive" but they don't have a very promising future. Android is currently defining success. The vast majority of the population has never heard of Linux, but they have heard of Android. And unless someone with money gets behind Linux and pushes it to the public as an appliance delivering a service that they want, they never will.
"Here's where I disagree, I think third-party apps is why the Linux desktop has never taken off. I don't mean OpenOffice/LibreOffice, Gimp, I mean the wealth of business apps from ISV's that write for the Windows platform."
Well that's a big chicken and egg question though isn't it? Is it the apps that make Windows successful or the other way around? For some reason, people have a different perspective on Windows than they do with almost every other computing experience out there. They talk about Windows compatibility as though that was a feature. You don't hear the same language in the Android or iOS space.
But you do raise an interesting point in that comment. There is a big divide in desktop usage. There are media consumers and there are business users and they do have very different requirements. Windows has the business desktop environment pretty much sewn up. I don't think Canonical are interested in that market though, especially since there are Linux-based incumbents in that sphere already (RedHat for example). They are after the consumers. I think that Android took Canonical a bit by surprise but they definitely want a piece of that media consumption pie. For a service delivery business like Canonical would like to be, that market is potentially very large indeed.
"My point was that Linux doesn't need big box vendors to survive."
"Survival" is not the same as success. White rhinos "survive" but they don't have a very promising future. Android is currently defining success. The vast majority of the population has never heard of Linux, but they have heard of Android. And unless someone with money gets behind Linux and pushes it to the public as an appliance delivering a service that they want, they never will.
"Here's where I disagree, I think third-party apps is why the Linux desktop has never taken off. I don't mean OpenOffice/LibreOffice, Gimp, I mean the wealth of business apps from ISV's that write for the Windows platform."
Well that's a big chicken and egg question though isn't it? Is it the apps that make Windows successful or the other way around? For some reason, people have a different perspective on Windows than they do with almost every other computing experience out there. They talk about Windows compatibility as though that was a feature. You don't hear the same language in the Android or iOS space.
But you do raise an interesting point in that comment. There is a big divide in desktop usage. There are media consumers and there are business users and they do have very different requirements. Windows has the business desktop environment pretty much sewn up. I don't think Canonical are interested in that market though, especially since there are Linux-based incumbents in that sphere already (RedHat for example). They are after the consumers. I think that Android took Canonical a bit by surprise but they definitely want a piece of that media consumption pie. For a service delivery business like Canonical would like to be, that market is potentially very large indeed.
Quoting:They are hedging their bets on tablets and desktops and assuming that they will all become one in the end.
There is no doubt about that if you mean hardware wise, OTOH, software wise (OS & Apps) I doubt it.
Take for instance the laptop, Notebook, Netbook and Tablet, they all have about the same basic hardware with couple components taken from one to make another. IOW, there is little difference between the hardware of any two and the main difference is the User Interface, usage, and size. So they pretty much can be combined, "Transformers Type", just like Motorola did with their Atrix device, [watch video].
In terms of UI, there is no reason why an interface similar to the KDE Plasma (Desktop, Netbook, Mobile) can't be utilized to give the user the option to choose what interface they prefer and depending on the device configuration at the time. Interns of usage, functionality & portability, they all are taken care of in the OS, applications and size. The question is, what is the cost of all combined vs separate devices, and how practical is it to have storage in and dependencies on multiple units?
The problem is not being "technologically challenged". Many relatively ignorant people manage to install Linux fairly easily and then use Linux quite satisfactorily -- and this has been true since at least 2002.
Mark Twain wrote: It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.
I just love Bro. "Mark" (Sam Clemens)... He always had a knack for stating the obvious in a profound & humorous way.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
Darn tootin'!!!