There is Free Software and then there is Free Software
|
|
|
Comments (6)
Fix my Typo
It's more than a little disingenuos to call the people who report the errors in your articles "nazis," but then ask them to continue to report those errors.
I can be a grammar nazi, in the tradition of The Producers.
"Springtime for Hitler and Germany,
(Look, it's springtime!)
Winter for Poland and France..."
"Springtime for Hitler and Germany,
(Look, it's springtime!)
Winter for Poland and France..."
someone should stop this guy
of using computers/software
@ padrian, for what reason?
What he said in the article seems perfectly resonable to me, a perfectly valid opinion although just not mine.
I make software myself although its not open source the Linux versions are free as in beer. The reason my software isn't open allows me to monetize it on the Windows platform, I freely admit this and I don't have a problem with it either I have a family to feed. My software has free open source competitors which means i have to ensure that my software is able to compete on ease of use and features. I am certainly not keeping my software closed to prevent choice as I said I have free and open competitors therefore plenty of choice is available and I most certainly don't practice lock-in which I despise.
I don't believe all software has to be open but i do believe in open standards and protocols to promote inter-connectivity between apps and platforms.
Once I no longer make money from my products I intend to release them under the GPL to prevent abandonment issues. Something that I am currently in the process of doing for one of my less successful apps which has had limited success on the Linux platform but bombed on the Windows platform for some reason I can't fathom as I aimed it at Windows users in the first place. So i've decided to cease full time development on it, open it up and move it to the back burner.
As i've said before in other threads I believe that open and closed philosophies can co-exist its not the philosophies that are the problem but the humans that practice each of them to the extremes.
I make software myself although its not open source the Linux versions are free as in beer. The reason my software isn't open allows me to monetize it on the Windows platform, I freely admit this and I don't have a problem with it either I have a family to feed. My software has free open source competitors which means i have to ensure that my software is able to compete on ease of use and features. I am certainly not keeping my software closed to prevent choice as I said I have free and open competitors therefore plenty of choice is available and I most certainly don't practice lock-in which I despise.
I don't believe all software has to be open but i do believe in open standards and protocols to promote inter-connectivity between apps and platforms.
Once I no longer make money from my products I intend to release them under the GPL to prevent abandonment issues. Something that I am currently in the process of doing for one of my less successful apps which has had limited success on the Linux platform but bombed on the Windows platform for some reason I can't fathom as I aimed it at Windows users in the first place. So i've decided to cease full time development on it, open it up and move it to the back burner.
As i've said before in other threads I believe that open and closed philosophies can co-exist its not the philosophies that are the problem but the humans that practice each of them to the extremes.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

If the grammar nazis round these parts find any other English errors on my part feel free to point them out so they can be corrected.
~Jeff