Scientists: All Research Should Be Open Source

Posted by lordpenguin on Apr 21, 2012 7:33 PM EDT
www.thepowerbase.com; By Tom Nardi
Mail this story
Print this story

Phys.org is reporting on a recently published paper that suggests all scientific journals should require the full disclosure of source code as a condition of publication. The paper states that only 3 science journals currently require source code.

Open Source Science

The paper makes some very good points. It makes the argument that, as computers play an increasingly important role in scientific research, the code those computers run should be just as open as any other part of the experiment. For other scientists to be able to reproduce the results and improve on the work, they need to have access to all of the materials used. Withholding the source code is akin to censoring out part of the research: it prevents others from continuing where the original research left off.

This is, of course, the exact reasoning behind free software licenses such as the GPL. Work on one project should be easily applied to all others, and anyone who benefits from that work must give back any improvements or changes they made. This principle has worked brilliantly well for web servers, browsers, and operating systems, so why not for science?

The Phys.org report then goes on to comment on an issue that is all too familiar:

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story

« Return to the newswire homepage

Subject Topic Starter Replies Views Last Post
Overstated montezuma 1 987 Apr 21, 2012 9:22 PM

You cannot post until you login.