Report: The alternative OS, my top 5
Number 5: AROS Icaros 1.4.1 |
|
|
Comments (26)
6 earlier comments in the full thread.
I find the code itself quite fascinating, and I'm surprised that more web sites haven't latched onto it AND hidden it.
It would be interesting if some of the larger "bot-net" operators haven't figured this out as a secondary (or maybe primary) use of their nefarious activities.
Being on a work machine, I did bop over to see what the script looks like, and it was quite unobtrusive even if it did start winding up my laptop fan. :^)
Thank you for taking it down, although I wouldn't object if it were set up for "opt in".
But if anyone does it will disappear into the void for good.
Hope i haven't put too many people off. Thanks for the feed back guys its much appreciated :)
"Opt-in" is usually preferable to "opt-out". It seems to me that, on website matters, the easiest way to provide an "opt-in" is to put something on its own page. In the matter at hand, I think a simple "help me earn some Litecoin" page, with a link to it on the other site pages, would work best.
But I don't really know how Litecoin works.
Quoting:If none here object to the idea of having an opt in option i could re-enable it in that capacity.
Patrick,
If you can make that work, I have no objection whatsoever. My objection was to it being foisted on your site's visitors without any clear and prominent disclaimer. Like gus3, I don't really know how Litecoin works, but I think his idea has merit.
Few would object to a reasonably forthright and not too obtrusive, opt-in.
Quoting:Would NoScript be handling this? Just curious, I'm on Winders at the moment so I won't dare try the link.Yes, if your NoScript is configured to forbid Java in Options > Embedding > Forbid Java -- which I think is the default setting.
If simply competing was illegal, Canada would be in danger. :^)
The obvious issue that the US government might be interested in, in this case, is taxation, but that is bordering on TOS violation and we don't want to go there, do we? :D
Back to the original point, I think most sane users of the Internet these days have pretty much everything locked down, don't they? Noscript, Adblock Plus, JAVA switched off (or better, not installed), cookies disabled by default....
http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/99jul/9907moneya...
http://localcurrencycouncil.org/index.php/resources/features... (with pictures)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._S._G._Boggs
Green/Community Currencies:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_currency
http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-04-05-scrip_N.htm
Also, you're technically not allowed to offer something for sale exclusively in a competing currency (Legal tender law).
That's a strange definition of a terrorist, unless there is an angle to the story that I don't see. :D
Von Nothaus' prosecution depended upon photographs of the Liberty Dollar that were deliberately made to look like US coins and bills. The actual receipts and rounds (can't even use the word 'coin') were never shown to the jury. His only mistake was using the word "dollar". Not even "US Dollar", just "dollar".
Anyone who has held a one-ounce silver round would know perfectly well that there is nothing to confuse it with a United States quarter. But the prosecution didn't allow that.
It had nothing to do with "less than market value".
Legal tender law only says that one must accept the legal tender if it is offered in payment, not that no other payment may be accepted.
There are many competing currencies. The Anarcho-Jessie Work Hour, Del Valley Silver, several other long running barter and work-hour receipt systems, all perfectly legal.
Yes, Skelband, there are huge obtuse angles to this persecution that you don't know about, which I will gladly discuss in private messages due to not wanting to offend various sensibilities. Remember e-Gold?
Thanks, I hadn't heard about the Liberty Dollar fuss.
I guess Boggs managed to get by through the combination of only using one side, and by calling it Art (not that the Secret Service considered that kosher, either (they've even confiscated some of his "counterfeits").
Now I'm really wondering-- how do the various community currencies / "green dollars" avoid this harassment?
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
