Advanced

Linus Torvalds finds GNOME 3.4 to be a "total user experience design failure"

Posted by caitlyn on · 5 comments
ZDNet; By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
Mail this story
Print this story

When Fedora 17 released GNOME 3.4, I found I could deal with it. I still didn’t like it much, and I prefer both Ubuntu 12.04’s Unity and Linux Mint 13’s Cinnamon interfaces, but if I had to, I could live with the GNOME 3.4 desktop. But for Linus Torvalds, Linux’s primary creator, GNOME 3.4 is ”a total UX (user experience design) failure.”

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Fedora, GNOME, Linux

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (5)

caitlyn Story submitter ·
I have generally stayed out of the GNOME and Unity hate-fests on various fora. Generally, I believe we have more than enough desktop choices and I can safely ignore those I really don't like. However, after reading Linus' commentary, I have to admit that top of my "don't like" list is GNOME 3.x. It consumes the most resources and delivers the least functionality. Even with the various extensions I don't find it to be intuitive or a decent choice for me.

I can use much less memory and fewer CPU cycles running XFCE and I get a whole lot more usable desktop. I can also use MATE and achieve the same result. LXDE is a bit spartan for my tastes but it certainly is lightweight and gets out of my way. KDE is my full featured choice and it still consumes fewer resources than GNOME3, particularly if I disable nepomuk and akonadi. It also is very, very configurable, unlike recent GNOME iterations.

If I rant the rotten tomatoes start flying. If Linus Torvalds rants people listen because of who he is and what he's accomplished. I'm glad he's ranting again.
The beauty of a forum of ideas is the "churn". People try different things, see what works.

My first thought was, "Don't mince words, Linus, tell them what you really think."

Such fun.

I was pleased to see that Trinity made it onto the LinuxQuestions results. I guess I'm not the only one pining for KDE3.
No, can't disagree with you.

Gnome 3 is a tackled nest of rubbish. I just find that it gets in the way all the time. It is just so unbelievably annoying.

The absolutely #1 thing a DE should do is not get in the way. So as far as I'm concerned, it fails the primary test.
Linus ranted about KDE 4.x and switched to Gnome 2.x. Now he's ranting about Gnome 3.x. I suppose next he switches to XFCE 4.x and then rants about XFCE 5.x?

Personally I have no issues with Gnome 3.4. It took me all of a day or two to adust to not minmizing windows. It runs great on both my desktop and netbook, and is much more responsive on my netbook than KDE Plasma Netbook.

Of course, to each their own.

I hope Linus finds the DE he likes, and they never update it just for him. :)
Rex,

Maybe Linus would like Trinity, too. :^)

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post