Yet another Java flaw allows “complete” bypass of security sandbox
|
|
|
Comments (5)
I remember when Scott McNealy boasted of Java's security, and how it was designed from the bottom up to be immune to Windows nasties. I guess that was then.
Scott McNealy doesn't work there anymore.
Does anyone have a handle on how these Java sandbox vulnerabilities do/don't affect java alternative plugins like IcedTea>
how it was designed from the bottom up to be immune to Windows nasties
< snark > Windows nasties are still out of the question, since Windows doesn't run on the JVM < /snark >, but java isn't the security panacea Mr. MecNealy promised us.
Or did Oracle really bork it up that fast......
< snark > Windows nasties are still out of the question, since Windows doesn't run on the JVM < /snark >, but java isn't the security panacea Mr. MecNealy promised us.
Or did Oracle really bork it up that fast......
Well, this particular flaw predates Oracle's acquisition. This doesn't mean anything for any software that's not running as a web plugin, since that's the only version of Java in a sandbox anyway (the same as pretty much all the other Java security flaws).
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
