Advanced

Attack hitting Apache sites goes mainstream, hacks nginx, Lighttpd, too

Posted by BernardSwiss on · 8 comments
Ars Technica; By Dan Goodin
Mail this story
Print this story

Security researchers have uncovered an ongoing and widespread attack that causes sites running three of the Internet's most popular Web servers to push potent malware exploits on visitors.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story, Security

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (8)

Does anyone know the delivery method, how apache, nginx and lighttpd running on *nix servers are falling prey to this exploit? :-o
From the article:

Quoting:Researchers still don't know how servers are being infected with Cdorked. Because compromised machines are running a variety of administration controls, cPanel and competing software aren't obvious suspects. Cdorked doesn't have the ability to spread by itself and doesn't exploit a vulnerability in any other specific piece of software, either.


This seems like the kind of exploit (at the server side) that would be greatly hindered by SELinux style enhanced separations.

It's also very interesting to note that, while those infected do not know how (yet) it was done, it's been done to a relatively few. This tells me that it isn't easy to do.
Quoting:his seems like the kind of exploit (at the server side) that would be greatly hindered by SELinux style enhanced separations.
Agreed. I still haven't figured out why so many sysadmins fight SELinux. It's not hard at all to craft a policy and get it setup.
@caitlyn, SELinux may now be in a usable state, but the initial implementation was Byzantine, to say the least. It left a bad taste in many mouths, even if it did work as advertised.

Much the same history as KDE4's desktop paradigm.
gus3, this time we'll disagree. I had to write a whitepaper on SELinux back when it was a separate distro and have followed it ever since. It's always worked well and once you understood the logic behind it the way things worked really did make sense. Having said all of that, it is a lot easier to administer today.
Okay, then it was the doc writers' fault for putting out such poorly-explained techniques. Did you publish it somewhere public?
I couldn't. I was writing it for a US government agency under an NDA. FWIW, I think the current Fedora/Red Hat documentation is excellent. It wasn't always so but IMHO it is now.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post