- Site menu:
- Latest Discussions
- Latest Newswire
- Archives
- Submit Story
- Story HOWTO
- Syndicate
- E-mail Alerts
Filesystem Compression
|
|
|
Comments (5)
And compression before encryption is a lot more effective than vice-versa, if the compression isn't a 1-to-1 algorithm.
On the system partition compression might be worthwile. All those pesky binaries and libraries can save you a couple of gigabytes :)
Like my ex, who told some freeloader in a chatroom to delete his C:WINDOWS folder to free up some space on his hard drive. And then told him to reboot.
When he finally came back in three hours later to cuss everyone out, she pointedly told him, "The reason for our existence is not to give you free tech support. Either learn what you're doing, or pay someone to fix your problems."
When he finally came back in three hours later to cuss everyone out, she pointedly told him, "The reason for our existence is not to give you free tech support. Either learn what you're doing, or pay someone to fix your problems."
Free up disk space.
Solve countless malware problems.
Sounds like a win-win to me!
Sounds like a win-win to me!
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
However, look at file usage now. The big files are already compressed. Audio was the big one for a while, now it's video. These do not benefit from file system compression at all.
The people using huge raw (uncompressed) image files are also the kinds of people who will pay the extra $50 and get huge drives anyway.
All that said, I like full disk encryption. Privacy, don't you know.