Advanced

Microsoft Uses DMCA To Block Many Links To Competing Open Office

Posted by BernardSwiss on · 7 comments
Yechdirt; By Mike Masnick
Mail this story
Print this story

Another day, another example of excessive DMCA takedown actions. The latest is that Microsoft has been issuing DMCA takedowns to Google directing the search engine to remove links to Open Office. Open Office, of course, is the open source competitor to Microsoft, and Microsoft has no copyright-related rights over it. As TorrentFreak points out, this does not appear to be a one-off occurrence.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Apache, Community, Intellectual Property, Microsoft, OpenOffice.org

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (7)

Searching for "office" on google puts openoffice.org in the #3 slot. Its interesting that the #2 slot points to "The Office" TV series.
I wouldn't be surprised at all that Microsoft files inappropriate DMCA notices. While this does not meet the definition of censorship AT ALL there should be a penalty for filing false notices, with an increasing penalty for repeat offenders.
> While this does not meet the definition of censorship AT ALL there should be a penalty for filing false notices, with an increasing penalty for repeat offenders.

In theory, there is. It is my understanding that those notices are considered to be given under oath. False notices would therefore be perjury, both for the company and for the law firm issuing the notice. If the law were enforced, there would be severe penalties for multiple infractions.

Unfortunately, you may have noticed that US residents no longer live in a country where the law seems to matter, at least for those with lots of money or political connections.
I think that, as the law is written, there's an escape clause -- somthing along the lines that DMCA takedowns made in "good faith" or by "honest mistake" aren't subject to punishment.

> ...somthing along the lines that DMCA takedowns made in "good faith" or by "honest mistake" aren't subject to punishment.

A pattern of multiple such false statements would sort of break that "good faith" or "honest mistake" defense, wouldn't it?
> at least for those with lots of money or political connections.

As it has always been, and always will be, so long as arbitrary power is obeyed.
DMCA abuse is very common among content producers. They use it for everything from shotgun take-down requests to attempts to silence reviews/criticism. So long as the DMCA remains "the law of the land," the abuses will continue. Plus, those who support the DMCA have more lobbyists and financial backing than those who oppose it...

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post