Patent Troll Lodsys Settles for Nothing to Avoid Trial
|
|
|
Comments (8)
Settling the case gave Lodsys the opportunity to negotiate the terms of the settlement. Terms like non-disclosure criteria. They came away with an enforceable contract of some sort.
Simply dropping its case would have left them without any stipulations or recourse.
Simply dropping its case would have left them without any stipulations or recourse.
Exactly. It was still, to some degree, a win for Lodsys, since they have "lived to fight another day".
> Settling out of court seems silly for nothing.
I imagine Kaspersky now has a signed statement that they do infringe on any Lodsys patents and that Lodsys has no right to pursue the matter in the future.
I imagine Kaspersky now has a signed statement that they do infringe on any Lodsys patents and that Lodsys has no right to pursue the matter in the future.
"that they do infringe"
JD, do you mean "don't"?
JD, do you mean "don't"?
I'd like to see Kaspersky sue Lodsys for barratry.
"barratry". I had to look that one up. I don't speak legalese. "Litigation for the purpose of harassment or profit" looks like a doable concept, though. Retribution or retaliation from Kaspersky, anyone?
> JD, do you mean "don't"?
Yes. I'll leave it up that way though. No reason to get people thinking I can type at this point.
Yes. I'll leave it up that way though. No reason to get people thinking I can type at this point.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

Settling out of court seems silly for nothing.