Advanced

Top US patent judge resigns following “ethical breach”

Posted by JaseP on · 6 comments
Ars Technica; By Joe Mullin
Mail this story
Print this story

An e-mail highlighting praise for an attorney's argument led to resignation.

US Circuit Judge Randall Rader, who was just weeks ago the top patent judge in the nation, has announced he will step down, following an admission that he made an ethical "lapse" when he sent an e-mail praising an attorney who appears frequently before his court.

....

On the thorniest issues of patent law, Rader often came down on the side of having an expansive view of the power of patents. In the fractured Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank case now being reconsidered by the Supreme Court, Rader wrote a full-throated defense of software patents.

...

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Intellectual Property

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (6)

JaseP Story submitter ·
This is a huge deal. This judge was one of the most outspoken advocates of software patents, and his decisions have contributed to the mess we're in, as far as the law concerning the various forms of intellectual property. The scandal and his resignation just highlights the inbred cronyism that is patent law in the US. When I was in law school, the issue surrounding software patents was settled. Software, outside some connection to an otherwise patentable device with some form of physicality, was not patentable. Computers were regarded as a complex form of a player-piano, and software, the paper tape rolls... We need to go back to that, if innovation is going to continue.
But good luck getting a total review of this (clearly unethical) judge's decisions.

Some people are just flat-out unworthy of the robe. And sometimes, "contempt of court" is entirely justifiable.
JaseP Story submitter ·
A lot of the CAFC decisions have been reviewed/overturned in the "normal" course of business... So, I don't think there's any special consideration in getting reviews of other decisions of his. It's (maybe) ironic that the Supreme Ct. is soon going to be releasing its opinion on yet another one of his appellate opinions (writing for the majority)... Maybe that had something to do with the timing here?!?! Hmmm??? I guess we can only speculate.
> And sometimes, "contempt of court" is entirely justifiable.

F E Smith: Judge: "Are you trying to show contempt for this court, Mr Smith?" Smith: "No, My Lord. I am attempting to conceal it."
JaseP Story submitter ·
So,... That's where Mae West stole her similar line...
> That's where Mae West stole her similar line...

I'd say so, yes.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post