Enterprise Unix Roundup: Picking at the Red Hat Lock-In
|
|
|
Comments (1)
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

I am somewhat bemused by the high regard SuSE was held prior to being acquired by Novell. Red Hat employed developers that seemed almost entirely occupied coding and maintaining free software whereas the former was not even open about its superior updating tool. Moreover, I do not think SuSE was part of any free/open software development when it was independent. [Other than the Linux kernel where it had no choice.]
The potential for Red Hat to become an abusive force is overplayed and in hindsight some may regret its absence if it is annihilated by the larger entities that have sworn their true love of FOSS.