- Site menu:
- Latest Discussions
- Latest Newswire
- Archives
- Submit Story
- Story HOWTO
- Syndicate
- E-mail Alerts
Windows developers share open source philosophy
|
|
|
Comments (3)
A Passion for something
Welcome MadDogTMC. Another refugee from the advertilised LT.
On the story... Well, Shared Source != Open Source. What good is viewable source if it has more restrictions than share-alike?
If they wanted something really Open Source and they are still a bit under the influence of the (L)GPL is a Cancer thing, they could have used the CPL.
On the story... Well, Shared Source != Open Source. What good is viewable source if it has more restrictions than share-alike?
If they wanted something really Open Source and they are still a bit under the influence of the (L)GPL is a Cancer thing, they could have used the CPL.
OpenNETCF is not open, it's a racket
http://www.msmobiles.com/news.php/2923.html is all you need to know, even though it sounds a bit "sour grapes".
In truth all you really needed to know was that the licence was based on Shared Source, which is definitely not Open Source.
In truth all you really needed to know was that the licence was based on Shared Source, which is definitely not Open Source.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
This is my first post here. I am moving away from LT for a number of reasons. Their talkbacks brought me here now. I certainly appreciate the "no advertisement" approach. Because if I want something I "google it".