[Paul Ferris: RANT_MODE=1] This Christmas, give the gift that doesn't keep on taking ...
A long December, and there's reason to believe, maybe this year will be better than the last... -- Counting Crows A Long December Here we are in December of 2004. It's been roughly 6 years since the government brought suit against Microsoft for blatant anti-trust violation. They had gotten into trouble for bolting Internet Explorer into Windows 98, remember? As usual, the judge and almost everyone else that was paying attention agreed that they had broken the law. Also as usual, they got off the hook with a slap on the wrist. Now for the funny part. In July of this year, whilst some of the remaining states (MA and ND) were more or less giving up on real justice for Microsoft -- related directly to the fact that U.S. consumers were harmed -- another arm of our government (the Department of Homeland Security) was busy telling those very same Americans to switch to Mozilla based browsers -- because it's safer. Most people didn't notice those two events. They happened right around Independence day of this year. What Irony. But don't worry, consumers have not been harmed. It's a hallucination that all of you technologically savvy people have been out helping people with Windows-related security "issues". You know, neighbors, relatives, friends and complete strangers. You're busy helping them reload, repair and replace windows so that they can get it re-infected in, how much time would you say here?
I've tried my best to give up on this kind of time for myself, but from time to time I do attempt to help. Lately, I've given over to having people take the most severe cases to a PC shop. I tell them (honestly) that I no longer understand enough about Windows to help them fix their virus problems. While this is true on the surface, the deeper truth is that, like learning to bungee jump with piano wire, I find little value in learning the finer nuances of how to clean Windows PCs of viruses. For the most part, it's not (in my opinion) a valuable sport to pick up. Much more satisfying is helping people convert their desktop experiences to GNU/Linux. For the rare occasion when I do actually help someone clear up a Windows-related issue, I always refuse to be paid under the condition that (honestly) they please "don't tell your friends that I can do this." And I'm serious. As a virus attack.
I can hear the keyboard activity from here:
To which I already have a the following responses prepared (See, I'm all about saving you time and embarrassment): "It doesn't matter." There, that wasn't so bad, was it? You see, even ignoring my (somewhat biased on the Linux side) opinion that if Linux had a majority share, it would be more secure by leaps and bounds than Windows is today. Even ignoring the evidence that Free Software, in a majority market share has less virus exploits written for it. It seriously doesn't matter. This is because the simple, relevent and boring fact is, most viruses at this very moment and for the forseeable future are ... (drum-roll please) Being written for Microsoft Windows, and not Linux. Let me illustrate this with a real world example. Let's take my brother, Art, for example. I took an old piece of hardware out of my vast collection in the basement, and loaded Fedora Core RC3 for him. Ran all the updates, got all the cool stuff. The box can now surf the web, has a firewall, has a mail client -- word processing, and a bunch of other cool software. It's his Christmas present this year. Fundamentally, forgetting all about integrated SELinux, the integrated firewall, the multi-user aware nature of Linux and the like, it's just as insecure as Windows. Maybe. Anybody want to lay odds on it getting a virus in the next two years? Let's not forget as well that by that time Longhorn, judging by Microsoft's own road-map, will still be in the works. All the theory in the world about security in this context Does Not Matter to my brother Art. All that matters is that for now and the forseeable future he has a box that he can hook to his broadband router and surf the web during the rough waters. You know the times I'm talking about? During those times that, inevitably, his Windows box will have gone south because it was infected/crashed/misconfigured/breathed upon slightly. At least, that's my prediction. I actually made a Linux box for him a few years ago and it survived a completely different form of attack. It survived the (darn-near-nuclear) abuse of 5 kids for over 3 years. They played games on it, rebooted it with the frequency of a disco-light, and it died finally from something like battery-failure if my memory serves me correctly. So here's all I'm trying to say. You read this or that pundit in the media talk about how when Linux gets this or that market share it will be blah blah blah [attacked] by just as many yada yada yada [viruses/exploits] as Windows is today. Heck, the somewhat techno-savvy folks all around me are constantly repeating this droll like it came out of the bible. This is just another form of the (extremely stupid in my humble opinion) statement that Microsoft has made the computing universe a better place. It's not that I do or don't believe that they have. I don't, for the record ... Surprise!. It's that just like the pundits spouting this kind of garbage, I don't have magical access to alternate realities. Like the magical fantasy reality where Microsoft is truly competing at the desktop level with an organization or company which holds something like 30 to 50 percent market share. No one knows what that reality is truly like, so they can't take a gander over at, say, the cost of Windows in it. They certainly have no idea what the ease of use of the two products might be like, comparatively. Or, imagine this, the quality between the two products from a security perspective. If they could visit these realities somehow (imagine using mushrooms in conjunction with the latest service pack for XP in some strange combination), they could in that case, truly tell if consumers had been harmed or not. They might also be able to tell if that world was worse or better. They might, in that context, truly be able to tell if consumers had been harmed. Conversely these same people don't have access to the magical Linux kingdom reality. In that alternate reality, Linux has a 50% or better market share and is somehow being attacked by viruses that exploit it. GIFT_SUGGESTION_MODE=1 How long is a piece of hardware good for these days? 3 years maybe? Maybe, just maybe, the virus threat in three years for Linux will be several orders of magnitude worse than today. I'm willing to wager, for myself and my brother Art's sake that it will still be way lower than the insanity and insecurity that Windows brings to his household today. How much Linux capable hardware do you, dear geeky reader, have sitting around in your basement? How long to load Linux for a relative or friend that needs a rock to cling to in the chaotic, insecure digital storm of today? A rock that can be depended upon until Linux takes over, Microsoft releases LongShot -- er Longhorn -- or the virus/spyware writers learn to leverage yacc exploits in GNU/emacs? (There's a real Longhorn, er Long Shot for ya). Give the gift that doesn't keep on taking time, hardware, anti-virus software and privacy. Do it today for that friend or relative. Make this coming year (and the next) better than the last... Disclaimers RANT_MODE should not be attempted before your morning coffee. RANT_MODE=1 is an LXER.COM feature. Please take the time to thank Dave Whitinger for the first truly all encompassing Linux community news website to appear in years. You may find this column here from time to time. Paul (Fericyde) Ferris is a husband, father, Linux geek, and more. His opinions are his and his alone. He reminds you that the truth will set you free ... but first it will (probably) piss you off. Links [1]MA and ND close case on MS [2]homeland security recommends mozilla link [3]link to article on apache infection relative to IIS, [4]statistical measure of viruses for windows vs linux. |
|
|
Comments (14)
one kid at a time
My requirements for a laptop were, ease of use, battery life, and full range of software. and NO windows.
So a Powerbook moved in, the first two items installed were the X server, and a good terminal program.
Now my Linux server can run headless, and I don't have to worry about starting VNC, or other remote desktop stuff.
Now to get rid of those last few windows only games.
Why not XP?
I see that you are still alive, and, all appearances to the contrary notwithstanding, so am I. That, I suppose, is a good thing. Kinda nice to see Dave's still kicking around, too.
Truth be told, I am concerned at your lack of forward progress.
Seriously. Rant_Mode=1 ?
Since you started using that, we've seen Windows go from 98 to utter self-absorption (ME) to XP on the home front, and NT to 2000 to XP on the business front (well, there was the 2003 server edition).
We've gone from the United States to Red States and Blue States.
We've seen the Democratic Party go from savvy political machine to national hissy fit.
We've seen Red Hat go from Red Hat to a corporate service provider of the same name and Fedora.
We've seen VA-Linux go from -- Oh wait! We haven't seen much of VA-Linux lately, but it's about to be Japanese.
We've seen Mozilla squat, grunt, and squeeze out Firefox, ending a gestation period that seemed to take forever, but which, in reality, was a few days short of that.
We've seen the MacIntosh go from Mac OS to OS X, joining the Unix family in the process.
We've seen Linux go from upstart OS to serious corporate option and competent end-user platform.
We've seen 9-11, Afghanistan, Iraq, shoe-bombers and airport security that gets to feel up whomever it wants (We had to make sure you weren't hiding a couple of bombs in there, ma'am. By the way -- very nice!).
But rant_mode is stuck on 1.
That is SOOOOOOO twentieth century.
Why not rant_mode 2004? Or mode.Rant? If you're going to be unimaginative, might as well go rant-mode XP. At least you'd be stealing from the masters. You could go with rant_mode_64=however many gazillions 64 bits gives you. AMD might even toss in one of their nifty new 90 nanometer (as in, Hooray! We finally made it run cooler!) Athlon 64s for socket 939.
Movie buff? Why not Passion of the Rant, or rant_mode 911? There's always Lord of the Rants if you don't want to get too controversial, or Rantlish if you really want to be up-to-date.
Content with TV? Not a problem. You could go with Desperate Rants, Rant Factor. You could do 60 Rants, but the cost of experts to authenticate everything you put out would drive you into the poor house.
Are you still hoping that the Browns, Indians, and/or Cavaliers will amount to something? Why not rant_mode=hopeless. You could try Rant Nation. Worked for the Red Sox.
The possibilities are endless. Get to it.
By the way -- welcome back.
As usual, I see that for some strange reason, you cannot pass an opportunity to flame me in public. Dave sets up this beautiful web site, completely devoid of flash advertising, obnoxious colors and the usual busticated layout problems, and what do you do? You pollute the intellectual content by pointing at version numbers of hypothetical constructs (like my tag line). You missed Java, by the way (rantMode=1;)
Some things are best unchanged. Sometime you get it right the first time. Remember the days when you could log onto LT and actually read content without having to squint into a two-inch slit on your monitor. Ahh, those were the days. They were almost perfect, except for one thing.
Some crazy guy was always flaming me in the talkbacks... wait that was you!
You nostalgic hackers are all alike. You crouch in the dust of your museums, nothing but the glow of the emergency exit lighting and the smell of rotting chads to guide your way. You want progress to halt and if you could get the rest of us to use software from the 70, punch cards and magnetic tape, all the better.
You thought you'd mask your intentions by spouting on about progress, but I'm on to you! Ha! Dave's in on it too. We'll both spoil your little game. I'll set RANT_MODE to a jillion (possibly 2 jilliion -- don't tempt me here). Then -- THEN -- we'll see what kind of response from Dinotrac I get. Dave will put so many flash ads and banners on the site that you'll have to resort to a text based web browser to find the content.
We'll overcome your conservative ways. There are more than integer values and object-oriented constructs in the works for RANT_MODE, just you watch. In the mean time, you can sit back there with your paper tape and mainframe terminals -- we're onto you now!
I do applaud you at least for not bashing my stature. I'm guessing some lawsuit relating to your height-biased tendencies finally caught up with you.
PS: I've missed this too, for some twisted reason :)
Take care Paul
Blast from the past.... :)
--FeriCyde
Long time no see. Good to hear from you again!
-Steve Bergman
Maybe you should ask this for XMAS
I think it should say something more specific like:
"No, I'd rather have a nail driven into my skull than attempt to clean the crud off of your Windows box"
--or--
"I'll fix your XP box if you'll sign a disclaimer saying that you don't mind if all of your data and programs end up in the rotating vortex of oblivion..."
--or--
"What EES THEESE VEENDOS WIRUS THEENG YOU SPEEEK OFF?"
Whadya think? --Paul
maybe the last one would ...
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

My father and brother-in-law are getting Knoppix and openOffice CD's with their Christmas cards... My sister-in-law uses a Mac, so she's safe.....for now.