Advanced

A Way to Hammer at Windows

Posted by dave on · 2 comments
BusinessWeek
Mail this story
Print this story

Although IBM's open-source support is no money-maker, it does serve as a deft weapon to undermine Microsoft's markets. Big Blue collects about $1 billion a year in licensing fees from its hoard of 40,000 patents. So it came as quite a surprise to some on Jan. 11 when IBM pledged to make 500 of its software patents, valued at about $10 million, freely available to open-source software projects such as the Linux operating system and the Apache Web page server software. Why would IBM allow others to use its intellectual property free of charge?

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

Comments (2)

The whole open systems versus Microsoft thing in the press is sad. The truth is that there are people that implement cost-effective solutions using both Microsoft and Free Software. Microsoft isn't going to make those solutions non-cost-effective anytime soon, and the Free Software types aren't going to get their tools into the hands of people that don't have a good reason to switch.

I love articles like this, they play to the simple-minded reader who thinks there's a war going on.

Well, there is, actually, but it's one-sided. Microsoft can attempt to "protect" all of their so-called intellectual property (remember their outrage when they were sued by Lotus over the use of the slash key? Gee, they sure have turned a corner). They can fight all they want. More, I hope -- the thrashing is somewhat entertaining.

But they're gonna "lose" the enterprise-class heavy lifting as long as they continually think that this whole idea of "Windows-only" is ever going to be a cost-effective enterprise solution.

Far more their style will be the home market -- the consumer stuff. Yeah, I know they're facing stiff competition there, but the type of interface more suits the type of thinking that defines what Microsoft is all about.

IBM has been, is now, and will well into the future, understand how to run large-scale operations with real solutions and consulting might. The whole OSS/Free Software thing helps them do this more cost effectively. The fact that they are willing to share some patent stuff makes total sense to me in this context.

--FeriCyde
The other major disadvantage to a Windows only shop. a Monoculture is very bad for business. Even with firewalls, and lot's of network protection. It's a simple fact that Windows machines are routinely comprised and if a vendor brings an infected machine into your company, hooks it up to the network, it's very possible and all to easy to spread a virus across your network in minutes. If you have a large company shutting down for a day or two to clean it up isn't an option.

Windows here, Linux there, OS X over there. That way if one system goes down you have reserves to protect yourself.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post