Linux kernel on the road to ruin?
|
|
|
Comments (7)
I don't think it's so bad. Public arguments and discussions have always been a big part of f/oss developement. I'm sure I'm not the only one who appreciates the openness and accountability.
tuxchick: Oh, will you *please* shut up already.
[FeriCyde ducks]
[FeriCyde ducks]
/ME winces as FeriCyde fails to notice that tuxchick struck upwards not downwards.
Paulie --
Hope your recovery is coming along well. Maybe now you can fulfill that dream of yours to sing in the Vienna Boys' Choir.
Hope your recovery is coming along well. Maybe now you can fulfill that dream of yours to sing in the Vienna Boys' Choir.
AC: it was sarcasm, ok?!?
Tuxchick,
The openness is a double edged sword. But overall, it is far more a strength than a weakness. Though occassionally, it *would* be nice to be able to opacify the open source fish bowl.
The openness is a double edged sword. But overall, it is far more a strength than a weakness. Though occassionally, it *would* be nice to be able to opacify the open source fish bowl.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

Something as large as the Linux kernel will have problems, and papering over those would be stupid. Andrew is very not-stupid [obTMIAHMref], and has pointed some shortcomings out - an action which will in fact help to get them fixed - but he also pointed out some improvements and the non-decay of some good stuff, too. I don't see that getting reported. )-: