Campaign to make OS/2 open source begins
|
|
|
Comments (2)
At a guess, porting all the GNU stuff to OS/2 would take quite a bit of effort - like the NT designers, they failed to learn the lessons of Unix, Mach and Plan 9 with respect to process creation. In short, OS/2 doesn't have a fork()/exec() combo, it has some special purpose "Spawn" like functionality that means that corner cases become very difficult. What is it about OS and "object oriented" designers that makes them introduce abstraction induced complexity (http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/keppel93managing.html)?
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

But it would be nice.
still, I have to wonder if it would be all that relevant, given the advancement of a lot of the stuff that we call an OS today. I'm picturing people porting things like GNOME and KDE to it, all of the GNU stuff and so on -- and then someone going "I'm using OS/2? Wow! I thought I was using Linux!" Then the reply. "Well, it's the OS/2 kernel -- the rest of it's the same."