Linux Compression Format Flaw Found
|
|
|
Comments (7)
Dean,
You are just being unfair. While they were not 100% accurate, they did make it very clear that while the zlib open source project had not released a patch, the commercial Linux vendors, such as Debian, FreeBSD, Gentoo, and OpenBSD have already updated their distributions with version-specific fixes.
And very quickly, I might add. After all, when you buy the product instead of freeloading, that's the kind of support you are paying for, right?
-Steve
You are just being unfair. While they were not 100% accurate, they did make it very clear that while the zlib open source project had not released a patch, the commercial Linux vendors, such as Debian, FreeBSD, Gentoo, and OpenBSD have already updated their distributions with version-specific fixes.
And very quickly, I might add. After all, when you buy the product instead of freeloading, that's the kind of support you are paying for, right?
-Steve
sbergman27 - Debian, FreeBSD and OpenBSD "commercial"!???? Since when? Did they have an IPO last night and I missed bidding. How could I have let that opportunity go by and not buy into the Free Consortium? How? How? ;-)
I have no idea, if Gentoo is commercial, but the others are not, though you could buy a boxed set for FreeBSD. Just goes to show you those long haired, bearded, fuzz haired, hippie high school types will beat most commercial types any day of the week!
I have no idea, if Gentoo is commercial, but the others are not, though you could buy a boxed set for FreeBSD. Just goes to show you those long haired, bearded, fuzz haired, hippie high school types will beat most commercial types any day of the week!
S & T --
Fair, Schmair.
T'ain't a Linux problem. T'ain't, t'ain't, t'ain't.
Other than that, they pretty much got the facts right, but I'm old, I'm broke, and I'm cranky.
So there.
Fair, Schmair.
T'ain't a Linux problem. T'ain't, t'ain't, t'ain't.
Other than that, they pretty much got the facts right, but I'm old, I'm broke, and I'm cranky.
So there.
TxtEdEmacs,
I'll address your questions in the order presented:
1. Yes. 2. Last night. 3. Yes. 4. Dunno. 5. Ditto. 6. Ditto.
Dean,
OK... OK. So maybe we can blame it on Theo? ;-)
-Steve
I'll address your questions in the order presented:
1. Yes. 2. Last night. 3. Yes. 4. Dunno. 5. Ditto. 6. Ditto.
Dean,
OK... OK. So maybe we can blame it on Theo? ;-)
-Steve
sbergman27: Dean is right on the money. On top of those listed, MS-Windows machines using the native version of zlib (embedded in how many secret-sauce apps by now? given the licence, the only way you can know for sure is disassembly and examination) and/or CygWin are also vulnerable. Mac OS X also uses zlib in various places.
Definitely unfair to call it a Linux problem.
Definitely unfair to call it a Linux problem.
AnonymousCoward,
Speaking seriously for a moment, and just to be clear, I quite agree. In fact, it's not hard to imagine pieces of it having made their way into IE. Blaming it all on Linux was just one mistake in a very confused article.
Speaking seriously for a moment, and just to be clear, I quite agree. In fact, it's not hard to imagine pieces of it having made their way into IE. Blaming it all on Linux was just one mistake in a very confused article.
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

Patches are available.
Zlib, BTW, is not Linux and is not even Linux-specific.