Advanced

Fedora Core 5 Review

Posted by h00pla on · 4 comments
Linux Online; By Michael J. Jordan
Mail this story
Print this story

Fedora Core is a distribution developed by a community of developers sponsored by RedHat. Fedora is the descendant, so to speak, of RedHat's distribution for individual users, which they stopped selling a few years ago.

Applying the reverse of the Star Trek curse, I usually skip the even numbered Fedora Core releases. And since Fedora Core 5 was just released, and 5 being an odd number, I give you my customary combination how-to/review of this latest Linux distribution.

Fedora Core is a distribution developed by a community of developers sponsored by RedHat. Fedora is the descendant, so to speak, of RedHat's distribution for individual users, which they stopped selling a few years ago.

Applying the reverse of the Star Trek curse, I usually skip the even numbered Fedora Core releases. And since Fedora Core 5 was just released, and 5 being an odd number, I give you my customary combination how-to/review of this latest Linux distribution.

Installation

For those of you who are already familiar with Fedora, as it boots up you'll notice that the logo has changed. Just after the splash screen, you'll have the opportunity to check the disks you've just downloaded. Type 'linux mediacheck' at the prompt to do this. To those used to sizzling graphics, be forewarned that this part will take you back to the days of text mode.

Once you've checked your disks, you're ready to proceed with a standard install. First, you'll need to choose your language and your keyboard layout. Though the second choice is usually based on the first, it isn't in my case. Since I live in Spain, I have a Spanish keyboard (which is actually required by law) but I prefer my interface to be in English (my brain seems to work faster that way).

Since this machine was running Fedora Core 3, I was presented with a choice to upgrade. But I chose a fresh install, as I have done in the past. I've been given a few unpleasant surprises in the past with upgrades, though there's no reason this has to happen in this case.

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about:

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (4)

He treats the lack of proprietary codecs as basically a bug rather than realizing it's an advocacy issue. Don't whine about the world not using Free codecs and try and find a way around it, fix the world instead.

Tools supporting creation of content with Free codecs need to be supplied to those that are actually creating the content. That means, for example, getting video editors on Windows that support Theora into the hands of those that make videos, getting the Xiph codec bundle installed on their systems, and getting them Fluendo's Java player so they can easily share their content by simply dumping it on a web page.

Free Software can make it easier, which will lead to content being created in Free formats.
Sadly, the world still evaluates multi-media in terms of Microsoft supported codecs. I am impressed by the number Ogg-Vorbis handling devices now though. And the fact that almost every review of portable audio devices tends to mark down devices that do NOT support Ogg-Vorbis. So maybe some gains are being made.

I believe the industry, having dealt with jpeg and gif patents, and seeing the effects patents have had on RIM/blackberry, is starting to wake up to the realization that patents are killers of profitablility.

Ogg and png are attractive because they have been designed to be free of patent infringement.

The new enhancements to gpl v3 is also designed to ensure that users of software licensed under v3 will be assured of greater protection from patent infringement.

Right now every copy of gpl'ed software is a licensed copy. That's a great way to fight software piracy and copyright infringement. If the proprietary vendors keep up their patent shenanigans, more users will be forced to turn to free software to protect themselves and their businesses from possible disruption and financial losses.

Patents are regulatory mechanisms.

The corporations that embraced them wholeheartedly in the 1990's are starting to realize the Pandora's box they opened.

Unfortunately, some corporations still believe they will gain more in the damage done to their competitors, than they lose in damage done to themselves. They think they can control the hornets in the nest they found.

These corporations have not considered all of the factors. They are not counting on the submarine patent houses that have no competing products. They exist only to extract settlements through lawsuits. They will drain even the largest corporations dry, unless the patent madness is stopped.

number6x: Excellent, concise summation!

The patent madness does appear to be enlightening some people about the advantages of open, unencumbered standards. At least there is _some_ benefit from it.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post