Linux kernel 'getting buggier,' leader says
|
|
|
Comments (7)
Morton is full of it...
dinotrac:
That's not a bug in Linux. Those are nachos in your keyboard. Turn it over and spank it.
(Keyboard life-form, or, what happens if you _don't_ clean the nachos out: http://edge-op.org/images/01140013.jpg)
That's not a bug in Linux. Those are nachos in your keyboard. Turn it over and spank it.
(Keyboard life-form, or, what happens if you _don't_ clean the nachos out: http://edge-op.org/images/01140013.jpg)
grouch --
You were right!!! It works much better now.
Looked a little funny, but didn't taste bad at all.
Hold on...Will...get...back...to you...later...
GOTTA RUN!!!!
You were right!!! It works much better now.
Looked a little funny, but didn't taste bad at all.
Hold on...Will...get...back...to you...later...
GOTTA RUN!!!!
I'm really glad I set the drink down before clicking! Hope the, um, facilities are not occupied.
finally catching up to microsoft
"Lead maintainer Andrew Morton says defects are being added to the production kernel faster than they're being fixed."
Good, finally someone is investing some energy in catching up to microsoft. They have a huge lead, but the kernel team is talented and hard-working.
Good, finally someone is investing some energy in catching up to microsoft. They have a huge lead, but the kernel team is talented and hard-working.
tuxchick2:
Sure they may be able to crank up their efforts enough to get a respectable load of bugs in place, but they are sooo far behind in such wondrous accomplishments as PR and security.
"Honestly, security experts don't pick on Microsoft because we have some fundamental dislike for the company. Indeed, Microsoft's poor products are one of the reasons we're in business. We pick on them because they've done more to harm Internet security than anyone else, because they repeatedly lie to the public about their products' security, and because they do everything they can to convince people that the problems lie anywhere but inside Microsoft." -- Bruce Schneier, 2002
Microsoft's lead in putting broken screen doors in submarines and then blaming the flood on the passengers is just formidable.
Sure they may be able to crank up their efforts enough to get a respectable load of bugs in place, but they are sooo far behind in such wondrous accomplishments as PR and security.
"Honestly, security experts don't pick on Microsoft because we have some fundamental dislike for the company. Indeed, Microsoft's poor products are one of the reasons we're in business. We pick on them because they've done more to harm Internet security than anyone else, because they repeatedly lie to the public about their products' security, and because they do everything they can to convince people that the problems lie anywhere but inside Microsoft." -- Bruce Schneier, 2002
Microsoft's lead in putting broken screen doors in submarines and then blaming the flood on the passengers is just formidable.
you forget the added income from screen door replacement, then there's the hull patching service and the franchise for those little oxygen cylinders...
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post

I think I know a thing or two about Linux -- after all, I run it on my PC -- and this Morton gux is all me**ed up.
Linux has been complugle relib7x for me. No prglebs at all. So, I th8nU Mr, Moblug should keep his op8xty1 to himbvlf, as he c&ez(ly doe*n@t k999 anyfliggle.
Still, a debug release might be good.