- Site menu:
- Latest Discussions
- Latest Newswire
- Archives
- Submit Story
- Story HOWTO
- Syndicate
- E-mail Alerts
Microsoft: Linux not 'reliable or dependable'
|
|
|
Comments (4)
Read the Original
I think you should
put Linux with striked font ,
That is how i read that title news "Microsoft not reliable or dependable"
hilarious
The truth is that Linux would not be doing nearly so well if not for Windows poor reliability and dependability. TCP (Total Cost of Purchasing) be damned; even if I had to pay twice the cost of Windows for a Linux distro, Linux would be a bargain in freeing up my time otherwise spent keeping XP limping along. You may rightfully say that the user might be the problem in my case, but it was the same user that had trouble with XP but a ultra reliable, faster, more dependable PC with the same hardware running Linux.
later, mcinsand
later, mcinsand
ms says what they say
Just M$ spreading more FUD
FUD = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FUD
Post a comment
A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.
Your message:Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help
Sign up and post (it is free) or Log in and post
Then entertain your self by reading the talkbacks http://news.com.com/5208-7344-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=1712...
And be sure not to miss this one http://news.com.com/5208-7344-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=1712...