Advanced

Solaris vs. Linux: Framework for the Comparison in Large Enterprise Environments

Posted by nixcraft on · 4 comments
softpanorama.org; By Dr. Nikolai Bezroukov
Mail this story
Print this story

This is not a scientific comparison per se but more of an attempt to formulate the framework for comparison that might be used by future authors. Actually the fact that a particular person is interested in the theme to the extent that he/she wrote such a paper is a strong argument against his/her depth of knowledge in one or both OSes that he/she tries to compare ;-).

Author conclusion is as follows:

"All-in-all Solaris is a powerful, stable, conformant-to-standards OS that can run many open source applications as well as Linux, and some (mainly multithreaded applications) better than Linux. Like in the cases of Red Hat and Suse, the cost of support is extra, but it is more reasonably priced. Security patches are free which makes Solaris similar to Windows."

Full Story

  Nav
» Read more about: Story Type: News Story; Groups: Debian, Novell

» Get new stories by e-mail: nightly or as they are published

« Return to the newswire homepage

  Related stories
» More like this

Comments (4)

The paper was really cheerleading for solaris while attempting to appear balanced. One tipoff is the fact that the author makes comparisons between the brand spanking new solaris 10 and the old linux 2.4 kernel.

I also noticed that he cited a published mysql benchmark in which solaris outperformed linux, but didn't mention the other benchmarks which showed linux beating solaris. Selective benchmarking?

Just a thought...
Only companies pushing proprietary software really regards equivalent software as a 'threat'. The perception that profits are in jeopardy motivates bias and FUD regardless of the facts. Competition within the open software community, while still there, just doesn't normally have that same motivation to lie cheat and steal.

In this case the black sheep 'Unix clone' is finally surpassing the real deal, and Sun don't like that much.
I'm not experienced with Sun's products at all, but my perception is they really missed the boat. Oldtime Sun and Solaris admins still have a lot of affection for Sun and their products, both software and hardware, and would still be using them if it made sense in terms of costs, support, and keeping up with the times. In fact a lot of my friends are sticking with them, even though their stuff is obsolete. The one Sun thing that has me very interested is the ZFS filesystem. This is truly revolutionary, and it just might be the kick in the pants that OpenSolaris needs to attract a decent-sized user and dev community.

What I would love to try is some kind of Linux or BSD or OpenSolaris on gen-yoo-wine server or workstation-quality hardware that is not extortionately priced, with a real Unix-type BIOS and boot system and partition table, instead of the horrid crippled x86 platform. Something that fully supports a remote serial console and complete remote control of the boot process, including step-by-step booting and logging.
[url=http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=debian solaris&btnG=Google Search]http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=debian solaris&btnG=Goo...[/url]

Looks like a bunch of people are talking about Debian/Solaris.

Post a comment

A free account is needed to post. Write your comment here first: your text is kept in this browser while you sign up or log in, and is waiting for you when you come back.

Your message:
|||||
10
Markdown: **bold**, *italic*, [text](https://link), - lists, > quotes, $x^2$ for math. Formatting help

Sign up and post (it is free)  or  Log in and post